Feasibility of a Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Text Reminders for Immunization Compliance in Kids (TRICKs)
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To pilot test the Text Reminders for Immunization Compliance in Kids (TRICKs) program to evaluate its feasibility and potential to increase immunization coverage.
Design: Randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Setting: Pediatric clinic.
Participants: Parents of newborns being discharged from a local hospital who intended to seek child health care at the University-sponsored pediatric resident and faculty clinic.
Intervention: Text message immunization reminders prior to immunization due dates.
Main Outcome Measures: Receipt and timeliness of immunizations at 2, 4 and 6 months of age.
Results: Participants (N=90) were English (83%) or Spanish (17%) speaking. The majority were female (83%), on public insurance (59%), and had adequate health literacy (96%). Parents were married or a member of an unmarried couple (62%). Over 66% had a high school diploma or less. Greater numbers of intervention children received immunizations and were "on time" using per protocol analysis; though not statistically significance. Limitations include sample size, problematic text messaging software, and loss of phone service at 7 months for 40% of intervention parents. However, post-intervention interviews (N=18) indicated strong support for TRICKs; 83% found the text message reminders very helpful and 17% somewhat helpful.
Discussion: Pilot testing allowed us to assess processes, including recruitment, retention, and software, which will increase the success of an RCT. Software with built-in backup systems is needed for follow-up when mobile service is interrupted. However, in spite of limitations, immunization rates were higher in the text message reminder group, though not statistically significant. Parent support and interest was high. A fully powered RCT is needed with follow-up over the full 4-3-1-3-3-1 series. Based on our results, for 80% power where we expected 90% compliance in the intervention group and 80% in the control group we need 219 per group, plus increases to address drop out and loss of follow-up.
Louw G, Hohlfeld A, Kalan R, Engel M Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(10).
PMID: 39460318 PMC: 11511517. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12101151.
Currie G, McLeod C, Waddington C, Snelling T BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1753.
PMID: 38956527 PMC: 11218178. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18900-4.
Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Malik A, Ahmed N, Shafiq M, Elharake J, James E, Nyhan K Health Policy. 2023; 137:104894.
PMID: 37714082 PMC: 10885629. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104894.
MacDonald S, Marfo E, Sell H, Assi A, Frank-Wilson A, Atkinson K JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022; 10(11):e37579.
PMID: 36346666 PMC: 9682453. DOI: 10.2196/37579.
Text Message Reminders for the Second Dose of Influenza Vaccine for Children: An RCT.
Stockwell M, Shone L, Nekrasova E, Wynn C, Torres A, Griffith M Pediatrics. 2022; 150(3).
PMID: 35965283 PMC: 9592065. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-056967.