» Articles » PMID: 29316845

Rho Inhibitor VX-210 in Acute Traumatic Subaxial Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Design of the SPinal Cord Injury Rho INhibition InvestiGation (SPRING) Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal J Neurotrauma
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2018 Jan 11
PMID 29316845
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with a lifetime of disability stemming from loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions; these losses, along with increased comorbid sequelae, negatively impact health outcomes and quality of life. Early decompression surgery post-SCI can enhance patient outcomes, but does not directly facilitate neural repair and regeneration. Currently, there are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacological therapies to augment motor function and functional recovery in individuals with traumatic SCI. After an SCI, the enzyme, Rho, is activated by growth-inhibitory factors and regulates events that culminate in collapse of the neuronal growth cone, failure of axonal regeneration, and, ultimately, failure of motor and functional recovery. Inhibition of Rho activation is a potential treatment for injuries such as traumatic SCI. VX-210, an investigational agent, inhibits Rho. When administered extradurally after decompression (corpectomy or laminectomy) and stabilization surgery in a phase 1/2a study, VX-210 was well tolerated. Here, we describe the design of the SPRING trial, a multicenter, phase 2b/3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VX-210 (NCT02669849). A subset of patients with acute traumatic cervical SCI is currently being enrolled in the United States and Canada. Medical, neurological, and functional changes are evaluated at 6 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months after VX-210 administration. Efficacy will be assessed by the primary outcome measure, change in upper extremity motor score at 6 months post-treatment, and by secondary outcomes that include question-based and task-based evaluations of functional recovery.

Citing Articles

Methylprednisolone substituted lipid nanoparticles deliver C3 transferase mRNA for combined treatment of spinal cord injury.

Dong H, He Z, Cai S, Ma H, Su L, Li J J Nanobiotechnology. 2025; 23(1):98.

PMID: 39923070 PMC: 11807324. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-025-03153-z.


Histological effects of combined therapy involving scar resection, decellularized scaffolds, and human iPSC-NS/PCs transplantation in chronic complete spinal cord injury.

Ito K, Shinozaki M, Hashimoto S, Saijo Y, Suematsu Y, Tanaka T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31500.

PMID: 39733145 PMC: 11682313. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82959-7.


Axonal Regeneration after Spinal Cord Injury: Molecular Mechanisms, Regulatory Pathways, and Novel Strategies.

Elmalky M, Alvarez-Bolado G, Younsi A, Skutella T Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 39336130 PMC: 11428726. DOI: 10.3390/biology13090703.


Translational Relevance of Secondary Intracellular Signaling Cascades Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Zavvarian M, Modi A, Sadat S, Hong J, Fehlings M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(11).

PMID: 38891894 PMC: 11172219. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115708.


Neural regeneration in the human central nervous system-from understanding the underlying mechanisms to developing treatments. Where do we stand today?.

Kvistad C, Krakenes T, Gavasso S, Bo L Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1398089.

PMID: 38803647 PMC: 11129638. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1398089.


References
1.
McKerracher L, David S . Easing the brakes on spinal cord repair. Nat Med. 2004; 10(10):1052-3. DOI: 10.1038/nm1004-1052. View

2.
McKerracher L, Anderson K . Analysis of recruitment and outcomes in the phase I/IIa Cethrin clinical trial for acute spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013; 30(21):1795-804. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.2909. View

3.
Steeves J, Lammertse D, Curt A, Fawcett J, Tuszynski M, Ditunno J . Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures. Spinal Cord. 2006; 45(3):206-21. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102008. View

4.
Furlan J, Noonan V, Cadotte D, Fehlings M . Timing of decompressive surgery of spinal cord after traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based examination of pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Neurotrauma. 2009; 28(8):1371-99. PMC: 3143409. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2009.1147. View

5.
Velstra I, Bolliger M, Tanadini L, Baumberger M, Abel R, Rietman J . Prediction and stratification of upper limb function and self-care in acute cervical spinal cord injury with the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility, and prehension (GRASSP). Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014; 28(7):632-42. DOI: 10.1177/1545968314521695. View