» Articles » PMID: 29314871

Normative Functional Performance Values in High School Athletes: The Functional Pre-Participation Evaluation Project

Abstract

Context:   The fourth edition of the Preparticipation Physical Evaluation recommends functional testing for the musculoskeletal portion of the examination; however, normative data across sex and grade level are limited. Establishing normative data can provide clinicians reference points with which to compare their patients, potentially aiding in the development of future injury-risk assessments and injury-mitigation programs.

Objective:   To establish normative functional performance and limb-symmetry data for high school-aged male and female athletes in the United States.

Design:   Cross-sectional study.

Setting:   Athletic training facilities and gymnasiums across the United States.

Patients Or Other Participants:   A total of 3951 male and female athletes who participated on high school-sponsored basketball, football, lacrosse, or soccer teams enrolled in this nationwide study.

Main Outcome Measure(s):   Functional performance testing consisted of 3 evaluations. Ankle-joint range of motion, balance, and lower extremity muscular power and landing control were assessed via the weight-bearing ankle-dorsiflexion-lunge, single-legged anterior-reach, and anterior single-legged hop-for-distance (SLHOP) tests, respectively. We used 2-way analyses of variance and χ analyses to examine the effects of sex and grade level on ankle-dorsiflexion-lunge, single-legged anterior-reach, and SLHOP test performance and symmetry.

Results:   The SLHOP performance differed between sexes (males = 187.8% ± 33.1% of limb length, females = 157.5% ± 27.8% of limb length; t = 30.3, P < .001). A Cohen d value of 0.97 indicated a large effect of sex on SLHOP performance. We observed differences for SLHOP and ankle-dorsiflexion-lunge performance among grade levels, but these differences were not clinically meaningful.

Conclusions:   We demonstrated differences in normative data for lower extremity functional performance during preparticipation physical evaluations across sex and grade levels. The results of this study will allow clinicians to compare sex- and grade-specific functional performances and implement approaches for preventing musculoskeletal injuries in high school-aged athletes.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical factors associated with patellofemoral pain in children and adolescents.

Sanchis G, Nascimento J, Santana R, Santos V, Cunha V, Assis S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):15490.

PMID: 38969665 PMC: 11226601. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64394-w.


Effect of Sex and Lateral Ankle Sprain History on Dorsiflexion Range Of Motion Asymmetry During the Weight Bearing Lunge Test.

Cady K, De Ste Croix M, Deighan M Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(6):714-723.

PMID: 38835979 PMC: 11144664. DOI: 10.26603/001c.117775.


Are Functional Performance Test Scores Better When Compared to Baseline or Contralateral Limb Scores Following LE Injury in Adolescent Athletes?.

Jones E, Jochum J, Corn H, OBrien M, Parks M, Armoush J Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(5):561-568.

PMID: 38707858 PMC: 11065785. DOI: 10.26603/001c.116272.


Reactive strength index during single-limb vertical continuous jumps after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: cross-sectional study.

Hirohata K, Aizawa J, Ohmi T, Ohji S, Mitomo S, Ohara T BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022; 14(1):150.

PMID: 35918729 PMC: 9344617. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00542-x.


Sex Differences in Pre-Season Anthropometric, Balance and Range-of-Motion Characteristics in Elite Youth Soccer Players.

Llurda-Almuzara L, Perez-Bellmunt A, Labata-Lezaun N, Lopez-de-Celis C, Moran J, Clark N Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(5).

PMID: 35627956 PMC: 9140908. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10050819.


References
1.
Hewett T, Myer G, Ford K . Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 1, mechanisms and risk factors. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(2):299-311. DOI: 10.1177/0363546505284183. View

2.
Teyhen D, Riebel M, McArthur D, Savini M, Jones M, Goffar S . Normative data and the influence of age and gender on power, balance, flexibility, and functional movement in healthy service members. Mil Med. 2014; 179(4):413-20. DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00362. View

3.
Soucie J, Wang C, Forsyth A, Funk S, Denny M, Roach K . Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia. 2010; 17(3):500-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02399.x. View

4.
Gomez J, Landry G, Bernhardt D . Critical evaluation of the 2-minute orthopedic screening examination. Am J Dis Child. 1993; 147(10):1109-13. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160340095022. View

5.
Clapper M, Wolf S . Comparison of the reliability of the Orthoranger and the standard goniometer for assessing active lower extremity range of motion. Phys Ther. 1988; 68(2):214-8. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/68.2.214. View