» Articles » PMID: 24806006

Prevention and Screening Programs for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Young Athletes: a Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Overview
Date 2014 May 9
PMID 24806006
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common among young athletes. Biomechanical studies have led to the development of training programs to improve neuromuscular control and reduce ACL injury rates as well as screening tools to identify athletes at higher risk for ACL injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these training methods and screening strategies for preventing ACL injuries.

Methods: A decision-analysis model was created to evaluate three strategies for a population of young athletes participating in organized sports: (1) no training or screening, (2) universal neuromuscular training, and (3) universal screening, with neuromuscular training for identified high-risk athletes only. Risk of injury, risk reduction from training, and sensitivity and specificity of screening were based on published data from clinical trials. Costs of training and screening programs were estimated on the basis of the literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed on key model parameters to evaluate their effect on base case conclusions.

Results: Universal neuromuscular training of all athletes was the dominant strategy, with better outcomes and lower costs compared with screening. On average, the implementation of a universal training program would save $100 per player per season, and would reduce the incidence of ACL injury from 3% to 1.1% per season. Screening was not cost-effective within the range of reported sensitivity and specificity values.

Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: Given its low cost and ease of implementation, neuromuscular training of all young athletes represents a cost-effective strategy for reducing costs and morbidity from ACL injuries. While continued innovations on inexpensive and accurate screening methods to identify high-risk athletes remain of interest, improving existing training protocols and implementing neuromuscular training into routine training for all young athletes is warranted.

Citing Articles

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention Programs in Welsh Netball: A Survey of Knowledge, Implementation and Barriers Amongst Players and Coaches.

Abdul W, Moore I, Robertson A Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60405.

PMID: 38882996 PMC: 11179151. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60405.


The larger patellar tilt angle and lower intercondylar notch angle might increase posterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a retrospective comparative study.

Huo Z, Hao K, Fan C, Li K, Li M, Wang F BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):933.

PMID: 38041089 PMC: 10691109. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07054-w.


Organizational risk profiling and education associated with reduction in professional pitching arm injuries: a natural experiment.

Bullock G, Thigpen C, Collins G, Arden N, Noonan T, Kissenberth M JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 3(3):295-302.

PMID: 37588509 PMC: 10426659. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.03.005.


Female Collegiate Dancers' Physical Fitness across Their Four-Year Programs: A Prospective Analysis.

Ambegaonkar J, Hansen-Honeycutt J, Wiese K, Cavanagh C, Caswell S, Ambegaonkar S J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023; 8(3).

PMID: 37489311 PMC: 10366741. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk8030098.


Athletes' knowledge and attitude concerning the meniscus, meniscal injury, and management.

Alqahtani T, Alshehri T, Kardum S, Al-Qahtani F, Alasmari M, Alzahrani F J Family Med Prim Care. 2023; 11(12):7926-7933.

PMID: 36994019 PMC: 10041000. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_934_22.


References
1.
Gillquist J, Messner K . Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the long-term incidence of gonarthrosis. Sports Med. 1999; 27(3):143-56. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199927030-00001. View

2.
Genuario J, Faucett S, Boublik M, Schlegel T . A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 3 anterior cruciate ligament graft types: bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, hamstring autograft, and allograft. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 40(2):307-14. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511426088. View

3.
Marder R, Raskind J, Carroll M . Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19(5):478-84. DOI: 10.1177/036354659101900510. View

4.
Lubowitz J, Appleby D . Cost-effectiveness analysis of the most common orthopaedic surgery procedures: knee arthroscopy and knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(10):1317-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.001. View

5.
Barrera Oro F, Sikka R, Wolters B, Graver R, Boyd J, Nelson B . Autograft versus allograft: an economic cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(9):1219-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.04.008. View