» Articles » PMID: 29311963

Ischemic Preconditioning Does Not Alter Performance in Multidirectional High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2018 Jan 10
PMID 29311963
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research dealing with ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has primarily focused on variables associated to endurance performance with little research about the acute responses of IPC on repeated multidirectional running sprint performance. Here we aimed to investigate the effects of IPC of the arms and the legs on repeated running sprint performance with changes-of-direction (COD) movements. Thirteen moderately-to-well-trained team-sport athletes (7 males; 6 females; age: 24 ± 2 years, size: 175 ± 8 cm, body mass: 67.9 ± 8.1 kg) performed 16 × 30 m all-out sprints (15 s rest) with multidirectional COD movements on a Speedcourt with IPC (3 × 5 min) of the legs (IPC; 240 mm Hg) or of the arms (remote IPC: IPC; 180-190 mm Hg) 45 min before the sprints and a control trial (CON; 20 mm Hg). The mean (±) time for the 16 × 30 m multidirectional COD sprints was similar between IPC (Mean : 16.0 ± 1.8 s), IPC (16.2 ± 1.7 s), and CON (16.0 ± 1.6 s; = 0.50). No statistical differences in oxygen uptake (mean difference: 0%), heart rate (1.1%) nor muscle oxygen saturation of the (4.7%) and (7.8%) between the three conditions were evident (all > 0.05). IPC (3 × 5 min) of the legs (220 mm Hg) or arms (180-190 mm Hg; remote IPC) applied 45 min before 16 × 30 m repeated multidirectional running sprint exercise does not improve sprint performance, oxygen uptake, heart rate nor muscle oxygen saturation of the muscle when compared to a control trial.

Citing Articles

Does ischemic preconditioning enhance sports performance more than placebo or no intervention? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Souza H, Oliveira G, Meireles A, Dos Santos M, Vieira J, Arriel R J Sport Health Sci. 2024; 14:101010.

PMID: 39536913 PMC: 11880722. DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.101010.


Muscle Oximetry in Sports Science: An Updated Systematic Review.

Perrey S, Quaresima V, Ferrari M Sports Med. 2024; 54(4):975-996.

PMID: 38345731 PMC: 11052892. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-023-01987-x.


Tent versus Mask-On Acute Effects during Repeated-Sprint Training in Normobaric Hypoxia and Normoxia.

Vasquez-Bonilla A, Rojas-Valverde D, Gonzalez-Custodio A, Timon R, Olcina G J Clin Med. 2021; 10(21).

PMID: 34768399 PMC: 8584473. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214879.


Methodological Variations Contributing to Heterogenous Ergogenic Responses to Ischemic Preconditioning.

OBrien L, Jacobs I Front Physiol. 2021; 12:656980.

PMID: 33995123 PMC: 8117357. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.656980.


Ischemic preconditioning has no effect on maximal arm cycling exercise in women.

Mota G, Rightmire Z, Martin J, McDonald J, Kavazis A, Pascoe D Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019; 120(2):369-380.

PMID: 31813045 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04281-9.


References
1.
Batterham A, Hopkins W . Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008; 1(1):50-7. View

2.
Nouraei S, Baradari A, Jazayeri A . Does Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Protect Kidney and Cardiomyocytes After Coronary Revascularization? A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial. Med Arch. 2016; 70(5):373-378. PMC: 5136438. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.373-378. View

3.
De Groot P, Thijssen D, Sanchez M, Ellenkamp R, Hopman M . Ischemic preconditioning improves maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009; 108(1):141-6. PMC: 2793394. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1195-2. View

4.
Paganelli W, Pendergast D, Koness J, Cerretelli P . The effect of decreased muscle energy stores on the VO2 kinetics at the onset of exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989; 59(5):321-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02389805. View

5.
Marocolo M, da Mota G, Simim M, Coriolano H . Myths and Facts About the Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Performance. Int J Sports Med. 2015; 37(2):87-96. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564253. View