» Articles » PMID: 29309021

Clinical Application and Psychometric Properties of a Norwegian Questionnaire for the Self-Assessment of Communication in Quiet and Adverse Conditions Using Two Revised APHAB Subscales

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2018 Jan 9
PMID 29309021
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Difficulty in following and understanding conversation in different daily life situations is a common complaint among persons with hearing loss. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no published validated Norwegian questionnaire available that allows for a self-assessment of unaided communication ability in a population with hearing loss.

Purpose: The aims of the present study were to investigate a questionnaire for the self-assessment of communication ability, examine the psychometric properties of this questionnaire, and explore how demographic variables such as degree of hearing loss, age, and sex influence response patterns.

Research Design: A questionnaire based on the subscales of the Norwegian translation of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit was applied to a group of hearing aid users and normal-hearing controls.

Study Sample: A total of 108 patients with bilateral hearing loss, and 101 controls with self-reported normal hearing.

Data Collection And Analysis: The psychometric properties were evaluated. Associations and differences between outcome scores and descriptive variables were examined. A regression analysis was performed to investigate whether descriptive variables could predict outcome.

Results: The measures of reliability suggest that the questionnaire has satisfactory psychometric properties, with the outcome of the questionnaire correlating to hearing loss severity, thus indicating that the concurrent validity of the questionnaire is good.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that the proposed questionnaire is a valid measure of self-assessed communication ability in both quiet and adverse listening conditions in participants with and without hearing loss.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaires in a Large Cohort of Self-Reported Normal-Hearing Adult Listeners.

Srinivasan N, ONeill S Audiol Res. 2023; 13(1):143-150.

PMID: 36825952 PMC: 9952610. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres13010014.


Importance of personality and coping expectancy on patient-reported hearing disability, quality of life and distress level: a study of patients referred to an audiology service.

Nordvik O, Heggdal P, Jonas Brannstrom K, Aarstad A, Aarstad H Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021; 19(1):168.

PMID: 34158058 PMC: 8220799. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01802-z.


An fMRI-study on single-sided deafness: Spectral-temporal properties and side of stimulation modulates hemispheric dominance.

Heggdal P, Aarstad H, Brannstrom J, Vassbotn F, Specht K Neuroimage Clin. 2019; 24:101969.

PMID: 31419767 PMC: 6706639. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101969.


Generic quality of life in persons with hearing loss: a systematic literature review.

Nordvik O, Heggdal P, Brannstrom J, Vassbotn F, Aarstad A, Aarstad H BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2018; 18:1.

PMID: 29386982 PMC: 5778781. DOI: 10.1186/s12901-018-0051-6.