» Articles » PMID: 29308228

Characterization of Puma-livestock Conflicts in Rangelands of Central Argentina

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jan 9
PMID 29308228
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Livestock predation is one of the major causes of conflicts between humans and pumas (). Using data from interviews with ranchers and kill-site inspections, we characterized puma-livestock conflicts in Villarino and Patagones counties of central Argentinean rangelands. Depredation was considered the major cause of livestock losses, and puma attacks were reported in 46.6% and 35.4% of ranches in Villarino and Patagones, respectively. The majority of ranches underwent losses smaller than 1000 USD. The proportion of livestock lost to predation (0.1-10.4%) and financial losses (5.3-1560.4 USD) per ranch/year varied across ranches, and small sheep ranches in Villarino were affected the most. Depredation was recorded only at night and preferentially in grassland with shrubs and cropland habitats. Although nocturnal enclosures appeared to decrease sheep losses, puma hunting was considered the most effective form of reducing depredation and was implemented by most ranchers. Mortality rates were 3.7 and 1.1-1.56 individuals/year × 100 km for sheep and pumas, respectively. Nocturnal fencing, shepherding and spatial separation from predators may efficiently reduce sheep losses. However, the poor association between the intensity of puma persecution and puma-related livestock losses suggests that conflict mitigation in central Argentina is not only about reducing damage but also about increasing tolerance.

Citing Articles

A Genetic Tool to Identify Predators Responsible for Livestock Attacks in South America and Recommendations for Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation.

Diaz E, Pozo M, Alarcon P, Pozo G, Zug R, Saenz C Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38539936 PMC: 10967510. DOI: 10.3390/ani14060838.


Global COVID-19 vaccine acceptance level and its determinants: an umbrella review.

Abate B, Tilahun B, Yayeh B BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):5.

PMID: 38166750 PMC: 10759439. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17497-4.


Livestock-Carnivore Coexistence: Moving beyond Preventive Killing.

Chinchilla S, van den Berghe E, Polisar J, Arevalo C, Bonacic C Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35203186 PMC: 8868381. DOI: 10.3390/ani12040479.


The Return of Large Carnivores and Extensive Farming Systems: A Review of Stakeholders' Perception at an EU Level.

Franchini M, Corazzin M, Bovolenta S, Filacorda S Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34200713 PMC: 8229100. DOI: 10.3390/ani11061735.


Framing of visual content shown on popular social media may affect viewers' attitudes to threatened species.

Ballejo F, Plaza P, Lambertucci S Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):13512.

PMID: 34188096 PMC: 8241864. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92815-7.


References
1.
Treves A, Naughton-Treves L . Risk and opportunity for humans coexisting with large carnivores. J Hum Evol. 1999; 36(3):275-82. DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1998.0268. View

2.
Caruso N, Lucherini M, Fortin D, Casanave E . Species-Specific Responses of Carnivores to Human-Induced Landscape Changes in Central Argentina. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0150488. PMC: 4780817. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150488. View

3.
Guerisoli M, Luengos Vidal E, Franchini M, Caruso N, Casanave E, Lucherini M . Characterization of puma-livestock conflicts in rangelands of central Argentina. R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 4(12):170852. PMC: 5749996. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170852. View

4.
Schulz F, Printes R, Oliveira L . Depredation of domestic herds by pumas based on farmer's information in Southern Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014; 10:73. PMC: 4271476. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-73. View

5.
Ripple W, Estes J, Beschta R, Wilmers C, Ritchie E, Hebblewhite M . Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science. 2014; 343(6167):1241484. DOI: 10.1126/science.1241484. View