» Articles » PMID: 29307671

Clinical Outcomes of a Single-tunnel Technique for Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Overview
Date 2018 Jan 9
PMID 29307671
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A large number of surgical techniques have been described to treat acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations. Despite the high success rates with double-tunnel reconstruction, this method has been associated with the risk of coracoid and clavicle fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the first cohort of patients who underwent single-tunnel AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction. It was hypothesized that this technique would result in maintenance of reduction and a minimal risk of fracture of the coracoid and clavicle.

Methods: All patients who underwent single-tunnel AC joint reconstruction between 2012 and 2015 via the technique with 2-year follow-up were included. Objective outcomes recorded were maintenance of reduction as measured by the CC distance on radiographs, shoulder range of motion, strength, return to sports, and complications. Subjective outcomes included maintenance of reduction on visual inspection and various patient-reported outcomes.

Results: Seventeen patients were included with a mean age of 41 ± 12 years. Separation types included types III, IV, and V. The mean follow-up period was 29 ± 9 months (range, 16-45 months). The CC distance improved from 37.4 to 30.0 mm on plain radiographs (P = .006), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 67.0 to 90.1 (P = .094), and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score improved from 30.5 to 91.1 (P = .025). Reduction on visual inspection was maintained in 16 patients (94.1%). Regarding sports participation, 14 patients (82.4%) returned to their preinjury level. The most common complication was a prominent suture knot stack, occurring in 3 patients (17.6%), which was removed in all 3 in a second procedure. There were no clavicle or coracoid fractures.

Conclusion: The described technique results in satisfactory objective and patient-reported outcomes and return to sports while avoiding coracoid and clavicle fractures.

Citing Articles

Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System Technique: A Systematic Review.

Elsenosy A, Elnewishy A, Hassan E, Rezk K, Alalawi M, Muthian S Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72515.

PMID: 39610579 PMC: 11602417. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72515.


Surgical management of acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations: a systematic review.

Sonnier J, Kemler B, Coladonato C, Paul R, Tjoumakaris F, Freedman K JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023; 3(1):10-20.

PMID: 37588062 PMC: 10426581. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.10.002.


Anatomical acromioclavicular joint stabilization with chemically sterilized tendon allografts: A retrospective study.

Vogt W, Borchert G, Ahmed N, Brune J Shoulder Elbow. 2023; 15(4):411-423.

PMID: 37538518 PMC: 10395406. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221136863.


Computed Tomography-Based Determination of the Optimal Locations of Bone Tunnels for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Zhang L, Xiong L, Zhou X, Li B, Tang X, Wang G Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(10):2692-2700.

PMID: 36093615 PMC: 9531094. DOI: 10.1111/os.13459.


Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage.

Jensen G, Dey Hazra R, Al-Ibadi M, Salmoukas K, Katthagen J, Lill H Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022; 33(4):1185-1192.

PMID: 35523973 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03271-6.