» Articles » PMID: 29307375

A Three-dimensional in Vitro HepG2 Cells Liver Spheroid Model for Genotoxicity Studies

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2018 Jan 9
PMID 29307375
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The liver's role in metabolism of chemicals makes it an appropriate tissue for toxicity testing. Current testing protocols, such as animal testing and two-dimensional liver cell systems, offer limited resemblance to in vivo liver cell behaviour, in terms of gene expression profiles and metabolic competence; thus, they do not always accurately predict human toxicology. In vitro three-dimensional liver cell models offer an attractive alternative. This study reports on the development of a 3D liver model, using HepG2 cells, by a hanging-drop technique, with a focus on evaluating spheroid growth characteristics and suitability for genotoxicity testing. The cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay protocol was adapted to enable micronucleus (MN) detection in the 3D spheroid models. This involved evaluating the difference between hanging vs non-hanging drop positions for dosing of the test agents and comparison of automated Metafer scoring with manual scoring for MN detection in HepG2 spheroids. The initial seeding density, used for all experiments, was 5000 cells/20 μl drop hanging spheroids, harvested on day 4, with >75% cell viability. Albumin secretion (7.8 g/l) and both CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 gene expression were highest in the 3D environment at day 4. Exposure to metabolically activated genotoxicants for 24 h resulted in a 6-fold increase in CYP1A1 enzyme activity (3 μM B[a]P) and a 30-fold increase in CYP1A2 enzyme activity (5 μM PhIP) in 3D hanging spheroids. MN inductions in response to B[a]P or PhIP were 2-fold and 3-fold, respectively, and were greater in 3D hanging spheroids than in 2D format, showing that hanging spheroids are more sensitive to genotoxic agents. HepG2 hanging-drop spheroids are an exciting new alternative system for genotoxicity studies, due to their improved structural and physiological properties, relative to 2D cultures.

Citing Articles

Application of microphysiological systems to unravel the mechanisms of schistosomiasis egg extravasation.

Alfred M, Ochola L, Okeyo K, Bae E, Ogongo P, Odongo D Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025; 15:1521265.

PMID: 40041145 PMC: 11876127. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1521265.


New advanced models (NAMs) for risk assessment of bisphenol A alternatives.

Honza T, El Yamani N, Dusinska M, Runden-Pran E, Marcon F EFSA J. 2024; 22(Suppl 1):e221116.

PMID: 39712915 PMC: 11659734. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.e221116.


In Situ Self-Assembling Liver Spheroids with Synthetic Nanoscaffolds for Preclinical Drug Screening Applications.

Wu L, Vllasaliu D, Cui Q, Raimi-Abraham B ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024; 16(20):25610-25621.

PMID: 38741479 PMC: 11129140. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c17384.


Impact of the Physical Cellular Microenvironment on the Structure and Function of a Model Hepatocyte Cell Line for Drug Toxicity Applications.

Allcock B, Wei W, Goncalves K, Hoyle H, Robert A, Quelch-Cliffe R Cells. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37830622 PMC: 10572302. DOI: 10.3390/cells12192408.


Adverse (geno)toxic effects of bisphenol A and its analogues in hepatic 3D cell model.

Sendra M, Stampar M, Fras K, Novoa B, Figueras A, Zegura B Environ Int. 2022; 171:107721.

PMID: 36580735 PMC: 9875311. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107721.