Comparison Between Scalp EEG and Behind-the-Ear EEG for Development of a Wearable Seizure Detection System for Patients with Focal Epilepsy

Overview

Journal Sensors (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2018 Jan 4

PMID 29295522

Citations 35

Authors

Ying Gu

Evy Cleeren

Jonathan Dan

Kasper Claes

Wim Van Paesschen

Sabine Van Huffel

Borbala Hunyadi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A wearable electroencephalogram (EEG) device for continuous monitoring of patients suffering from epilepsy would provide valuable information for the management of the disease. Currently no EEG setup is small and unobtrusive enough to be used in daily life. Recording behind the ear could prove to be a solution to a wearable EEG setup. This article examines the feasibility of recording epileptic EEG from behind the ear. It is achieved by comparison with scalp EEG recordings. Traditional scalp EEG and behind-the-ear EEG were simultaneously acquired from 12 patients with temporal, parietal, or occipital lobe epilepsy. Behind-the-ear EEG consisted of cross-head channels and unilateral channels. The analysis on Electrooculography (EOG) artifacts resulting from eye blinking showed that EOG artifacts were absent on cross-head channels and had significantly small amplitudes on unilateral channels. Temporal waveform and frequency content during seizures from behind-the-ear EEG visually resembled that from scalp EEG. Further, coherence analysis confirmed that behind-the-ear EEG acquired meaningful epileptic discharges similarly to scalp EEG. Moreover, automatic seizure detection based on support vector machine (SVM) showed that comparable seizure detection performance can be achieved using these two recordings. With scalp EEG, detection had a median sensitivity of 100% and a false detection rate of 1.14 per hour, while, with behind-the-ear EEG, it had a median sensitivity of 94.5% and a false detection rate of 0.52 per hour. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of detecting seizures from EEG recordings behind the ear for patients with focal epilepsy.

Citing Articles

Seizure Detection Devices.

Baumgartner C, Baumgartner J, Lang C, Lisy T, Koren J J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941534 PMC: 11818620. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030863.

Novel ML-Based Algorithm for Detecting Seizures from Single-Channel EEG.

Dweiri Y, Al-Omary T NeuroSci. 2024; 5(1):59-70.

PMID: 39483809 PMC: 11523704. DOI: 10.3390/neurosci5010004.

Detection Method of Epileptic Seizures Using a Neural Network Model Based on Multimodal Dual-Stream Networks.

Wang B, Xu Y, Peng S, Wang H, Li F Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(11).

PMID: 38894151 PMC: 11174829. DOI: 10.3390/s24113360.

Single-channel seizure detection with clinical confirmation of seizure locations using CHB-MIT dataset.

Chung Y, Cho A, Kim H, Kim K Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1389731.

PMID: 38836000 PMC: 11148866. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1389731.

Using a standalone ear-EEG device for focal-onset seizure detection.

Joyner M, Hsu S, Martin S, Dwyer J, Chen D, Sameni R Bioelectron Med. 2024; 10(1):4.

PMID: 38321561 PMC: 10848360. DOI: 10.1186/s42234-023-00135-0.

References

Mirkovic B, Bleichner M, De Vos M, Debener S . Target Speaker Detection with Concealed EEG Around the Ear. Front Neurosci. 2016; 10:349. PMC: 4961688. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00349. View

Qu H, Gotman J . A patient-specific algorithm for the detection of seizure onset in long-term EEG monitoring: possible use as a warning device. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997; 44(2):115-22. DOI: 10.1109/10.552241. View

Gu Y, Nascimento O, Lucas M, Farina D . Identification of task parameters from movement-related cortical potentials. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009; 47(12):1257-64. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-009-0523-3. View

De Clercq W, Vergult A, Vanrumste B, Van Paesschen W, Van Huffel S . Canonical correlation analysis applied to remove muscle artifacts from the electroencephalogram. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006; 53(12 Pt 1):2583-7. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2006.879459. View

Holsheimer J, Feenstra B . Volume conduction and EEG measurements within the brain: a quantitative approach to the influence of electrical spread on the linear relationship of activity measured at different locations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1977; 43(1):52-8. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90194-8. View

Hunyadi B, Signoretto M, Van Paesschen W, Suykens J, Van Huffel S, De Vos M . Incorporating structural information from the multichannel EEG improves patient-specific seizure detection. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012; 123(12):2352-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.018. View

Askamp J, van Putten M . Mobile EEG in epilepsy. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013; 91(1):30-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.09.002. View

Bleichner M, Lundbeck M, Selisky M, Minow F, Jager M, Emkes R . Exploring miniaturized EEG electrodes for brain-computer interfaces. An EEG you do not see?. Physiol Rep. 2015; 3(4). PMC: 4425967. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12362. View

Looney D, Kidmose P, Park C, Ungstrup M, Rank M, Rosenkranz K . The in-the-ear recording concept: user-centered and wearable brain monitoring. IEEE Pulse. 2012; 3(6):32-42. DOI: 10.1109/MPUL.2012.2216717. View

10.

Forsgren L, Beghi E, Oun A, Sillanpaa M . The epidemiology of epilepsy in Europe - a systematic review. Eur J Neurol. 2005; 12(4):245-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00992.x. View

11.

Casson A, Yates D, Smith S, Duncan J, Rodriguez-Villegas E . Wearable electroencephalography. What is it, why is it needed, and what does it entail?. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2010; 29(3):44-56. DOI: 10.1109/MEMB.2010.936545. View

12.

van Putten M . Nearest neighbor phase synchronization as a measure to detect seizure activity from scalp EEG recordings. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 20(5):320-5. DOI: 10.1097/00004691-200309000-00004. View

13.

Delorme A, Makeig S . EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 134(1):9-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. View

14.

de Boer H, Mula M, Sander J . The global burden and stigma of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2008; 12(4):540-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.12.019. View

15.

Farina D, Nascimento O, Lucas M, Doncarli C . Optimization of wavelets for classification of movement-related cortical potentials generated by variation of force-related parameters. J Neurosci Methods. 2007; 162(1-2):357-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.01.011. View

16.

Alving J, Beniczky S . Diagnostic usefulness and duration of the inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring: findings in patients extensively investigated before the monitoring. Seizure. 2009; 18(7):470-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2009.04.005. View

17.

Gabor A . Seizure detection using a self-organizing neural network: validation and comparison with other detection strategies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 107(1):27-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00043-1. View

18.

Shoeb A, Edwards H, Connolly J, Bourgeois B, Treves S, Guttag J . Patient-specific seizure onset detection. Epilepsy Behav. 2004; 5(4):483-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.05.005. View

19.

Debener S, Emkes R, De Vos M, Bleichner M . Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:16743. PMC: 4648079. DOI: 10.1038/srep16743. View

20.

Debener S, Minow F, Emkes R, Gandras K, De Vos M . How about taking a low-cost, small, and wireless EEG for a walk?. Psychophysiology. 2012; 49(11):1617-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01471.x. View