» Articles » PMID: 29281679

The Photosynthetic Bacteria Rhodobacter Capsulatus and Synechocystis Sp. PCC 6803 As New Hosts for Cyclic Plant Triterpene Biosynthesis

Abstract

Cyclic triterpenes constitute one of the most diverse groups of plant natural products. Besides the intriguing biochemistry of their biosynthetic pathways, plant triterpenes exhibit versatile bioactivities, including antimicrobial effects against plant and human pathogens. While prokaryotes have been extensively used for the heterologous production of other classes of terpenes, the synthesis of cyclic triterpenes, which inherently includes the two-step catalytic formation of the universal linear precursor 2,3-oxidosqualene, is still a major challenge. We thus explored the suitability of the metabolically versatile photosynthetic α-proteobacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus SB1003 and cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 as alternative hosts for biosynthesis of cyclic plant triterpenes. Therefore, 2,3-oxidosqualene production was implemented and subsequently combined with different cyclization reactions catalyzed by the representative oxidosqualene cyclases CAS1 (cycloartenol synthase), LUP1 (lupeol synthase), THAS1 (thalianol synthase) and MRN1 (marneral synthase) derived from model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. While successful accumulation of 2,3-oxidosqualene could be detected by LC-MS analysis in both hosts, cyclase expression resulted in differential production profiles. CAS1 catalyzed conversion to only cycloartenol, but expression of LUP1 yielded lupeol and a triterpenoid matching an oxidation product of lupeol, in both hosts. In contrast, THAS1 expression did not lead to cyclic product formation in either host, whereas MRN1-dependent production of marnerol and hydroxymarnerol was observed in Synechocystis but not in R. capsulatus. Our findings thus indicate that 2,3-oxidosqualene cyclization in heterologous phototrophic bacteria is basically feasible but efficient conversion depends on both the respective cyclase enzyme and individual host properties. Therefore, photosynthetic α-proteo- and cyanobacteria are promising alternative candidates for providing new bacterial access to the broad class of triterpenes for biotechnological applications.

Citing Articles

Current Metabolic Engineering Strategies for Photosynthetic Bioproduction in Cyanobacteria.

Satta A, Esquirol L, Ebert B Microorganisms. 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36838420 PMC: 9964548. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11020455.


Light-mediated control of gene expression in the anoxygenic phototrophic bacterium using photocaged inducers.

Hilgers F, Hogenkamp F, Klaus O, Kruse L, Loeschcke A, Bier C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:902059.

PMID: 36246361 PMC: 9561348. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.902059.


Engineering plant family TPS into cyanobacterial host for terpenoids production.

Rautela A, Kumar S Plant Cell Rep. 2022; 41(9):1791-1803.

PMID: 35789422 PMC: 9253243. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-022-02892-9.


In Silico Identification and Characterization of a Hypothetical Protein From Revealing S-Adenosylmethionine-Dependent Methyltransferase Activity.

Mondol S, Das D, Priom D, Rahman M, Islam M, Rahaman M Bioinform Biol Insights. 2022; 16:11779322221094236.

PMID: 35478993 PMC: 9036352. DOI: 10.1177/11779322221094236.


pSHDY: A New Tool for Genetic Engineering of Cyanobacteria.

Behle A, Axmann I Methods Mol Biol. 2022; 2379:67-79.

PMID: 35188656 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1791-5_4.


References
1.
Georg J, Dienst D, Schurgers N, Wallner T, Kopp D, Stazic D . The small regulatory RNA SyR1/PsrR1 controls photosynthetic functions in cyanobacteria. Plant Cell. 2014; 26(9):3661-79. PMC: 4213160. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.129767. View

2.
Xue Y, He Q . Cyanobacteria as cell factories to produce plant secondary metabolites. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015; 3:57. PMC: 4412135. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00057. View

3.
Li D, Zhang Q, Zhou Z, Zhao F, Lu W . Heterologous biosynthesis of triterpenoid dammarenediol-II in engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2016; 38(4):603-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10529-015-2032-9. View

4.
Dutton A, Mattiacci L, Amado R, Dorn S . A novel function of the triterpene squalene in a tritrophic system. J Chem Ecol. 2002; 28(1):103-16. DOI: 10.1023/a:1013514903036. View

5.
Khan N, Nybo S, Chappell J, Curtis W . Triterpene hydrocarbon production engineered into a metabolically versatile host--Rhodobacter capsulatus. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015; 112(8):1523-32. DOI: 10.1002/bit.25573. View