Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Cumulative Live Birth Rates Following Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Aneuploidy (PGD-A) or Morphological Assessment of Embryos: A Cohort Analysis
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy (PGD-A) for all 24 chromosomes improves implantation and clinical pregnancy rates per single assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle. However, there is limited data on the live-birth rate of PGD-A over repeated cycles.
Aim: To assess the cumulative live-birth rates (CLBR) of PGD-A compared with morphological assessment of embryos of up to three 'complete ART cycles' (fresh plus frozen/thaw cycles) in women aged 37 years or older.
Materials And Methods: A retrospective cohort study of ART treatments undertaken by ART-naïve women at a large Australian fertility clinic between 2011 and 2014. Cohorts were assigned based on the embryo selection method used in their first fresh cycle [PGD-A, n = 110 women (PGD-A group); morphological assessment of embryos, n = 1983 women (control group)]. CLBR, time to clinical pregnancy and cycles needed to achieve a live birth were measured over multiple cycles.
Results: Compared to the control group, the PGD-A group achieved a higher per cycle live-birth rate (14.47% vs 9.12%, P < 0.01), took a shorter mean time to reach a clinical pregnancy leading to a live-birth (104.8 days vs 140.6 days, P < 0.05) and required fewer cycles to achieve a live-birth (6.91 cycles vs 10.96 cycles, P < 0.01). However, after three 'complete ART cycles', the CLBR was comparable for the two groups (30.90% vs 26.77%, P = 0.34).
Conclusion: This is the first study to assess the effectiveness of PGD-A over multiple ART cycles. These real-world findings suggest that PGD-A leads to better outcomes than using morphological assessment alone in women of advanced maternal age.
Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future.
Brannstrom M, Racowsky C, Carbonnel M, Wu J, Gargiulo A, Adashi E Hum Reprod Update. 2023; 29(5):521-544.
PMID: 37328434 PMC: 10477946. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmad012.
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: helpful but not a first choice.
Ohishi S, Otani T J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 40(1):161-168.
PMID: 36508033 PMC: 9840739. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02683-x.
Vlajkovic T, Grigore M, van Eekelen R, Puscasiu L Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 11:CD013233.
PMID: 36423200 PMC: 9690144. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013233.pub2.
Lee E, Zhang J BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1197.
PMID: 36151546 PMC: 9508737. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08485-2.
Katagiri Y, Jwa S, Kuwahara A, Iwasa T, Ono M, Kato K Reprod Med Biol. 2022; 21(1):e12434.
PMID: 35386377 PMC: 8967301. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12434.