» Articles » PMID: 29279982

Mapping of Non-numerical Domains on Space: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Dec 28
PMID 29279982
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spatial numerical association of response code (SNARC) effect is characterized by low numbers mapped to the left side of space and high numbers mapped to the right side of space. In addition to numbers, SNARC-like effects have been found in non-numerical magnitude domains such as time, size, letters, luminance, and more, whereby the smaller/earlier and larger/later magnitudes are typically mapped to the left and right of space, respectively. The purpose of this systematic and meta-analytic review was to identify and summarise all empirical papers that have investigated horizontal (left-right) SNARC-like mappings using non-numerical stimuli. A systematic search was conducted using EMBASE, Medline, and PsycINFO, where 2216 publications were identified, with 57 papers meeting the inclusion criteria (representing 112 experiments). Ninety-five of these experiments were included in a meta-analysis, resulting in an overall effect size of d = .488 for a SNARC-like effect. Additional analyses revealed a significant effect size advantage for explicit instruction tasks compared with implicit instructions, yet yielded no difference for the role of expertise on SNARC-like effects. There was clear evidence for a publication bias in the field, but the impact of this bias is likely to be modest, and it is unlikely that the SNARC-like effect is a pure artefact of this bias. The similarities in the response properties for the spatial mappings of numerical and non-numerical domains support the concept of a general higher order magnitude system. Yet, further research will need to be conducted to identify all the factors modulating the strength of the spatial associations.

Citing Articles

The spatial coding of responses can depend on the spatial features of action goals.

Pezet E, Boussard L, Morgado N, Heurley L Psychol Res. 2025; 89(2):54.

PMID: 39960527 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-025-02081-9.


A SNARC-like effect for visual speed.

Vicovaro M, Boscariol R, Dalmaso M Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; .

PMID: 39881113 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-025-03012-x.


Effect of spatial training on space-number mapping: a situated cognition account.

Lenoir J, Badets A Psychol Res. 2025; 89(1):49.

PMID: 39833591 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-025-02078-4.


Number, size, and space associated in a common system by distinct mechanisms.

Cao B, Su Z, Yi F, Li F Psychol Res. 2024; 89(1):32.

PMID: 39636408 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02052-6.


Beyond fixed sets: boundary conditions for obtaining SNARC-like effects with continuous semantic magnitudes.

Leth-Steensen C, Moshirian Farahi S, Al-Juboori N Psychol Res. 2024; 88(5):1575-1589.

PMID: 38769219 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-01972-7.


References
1.
Lega C, Cattaneo Z, Merabet L, Vecchi T, Cucchi S . The effect of musical expertise on the representation of space. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8:250. PMC: 4006044. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00250. View

2.
Ouellet M, Santiago J, Israeli Z, Gabay S . Is the future the right time?. Exp Psychol. 2010; 57(4):308-14. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000036. View

3.
Viarouge A, Hubbard E, McCandliss B . The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: an individual differences approach. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e95756. PMC: 3997411. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095756. View

4.
Rolke B, Ruiz Fernandez S, Schmid M, Walker M, Lachmair M, Lopez J . Priming the mental time-line: effects of modality and processing mode. Cogn Process. 2013; 14(3):231-44. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-013-0537-5. View

5.
Cipora K, Hohol M, Nuerk H, Willmes K, Brozek B, Kucharzyk B . Professional mathematicians differ from controls in their spatial-numerical associations. Psychol Res. 2015; 80(4):710-26. PMC: 4889706. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0677-6. View