A SNARC-like Effect for Visual Speed

Overview

Journal Atten Percept Psychophys

Publisher Springer

Date 2025 Jan 29

PMID 39881113

Authors

Michele Vicovaro

Riccardo Boscariol

Mario Dalmaso

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Numerical and nonnumerical magnitudes can be represented along a hypothetical left-to-right continuum, where smaller quantities are associated with the left side and larger quantities with the right side. However, these representations are flexible, as their intensity and direction can be modulated by various contextual cues and task demands. In four experiments, we investigated the spatial representation of visual speed. Visual speed is inherently connected to physical space and spatial directions, making it distinct from other magnitudes. With this in mind, we explored whether the spatial representation of visual speed aligns with the typical left-to-right orientation or is influenced dynamically by the movement direction of the stimuli. Participants compared the speed of random dot kinematograms to a reference speed using lateralised response keys. On each trial, all dots moved consistently in one single direction, which varied across the experiments and could also vary from trial to trial in Experiments 2 and 4. The dot movements were left-to-right (Experiment 1), random across a 360° spectrum (Experiment 2), right-to-left (Experiment 3), and random left-to-right or right-to-left (Experiment 4). The results supported a relatively stable left-to-right spatial representation of speed (Experiments 1-3), which was compromised by mutable motion directions along the horizontal axis (Experiment 4). We suggest that representing stimuli as belonging to a single set rather than different sets, may be crucial for the emergence of spatial representations of quantities.

References

Bachtold D, Baumuller M, Brugger P . Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia. 1998; 36(8):731-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00002-5. View

Beracci A, Santiago J, Fabbri M . The categorical use of a continuous time representation. Psychol Res. 2021; 86(4):1015-1028. PMC: 9090696. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01553-y. View

Brysbaert M, Stevens M . Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial. J Cogn. 2019; 1(1):9. PMC: 6646942. DOI: 10.5334/joc.10. View

Casasanto D . Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009; 138(3):351-67. DOI: 10.1037/a0015854. View

Casasanto D, Bottini R . Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013; 143(2):473-9. DOI: 10.1037/a0033297. View

Dalmaso M, Schnapper Y, Vicovaro M . When time stands upright: STEARC effects along the vertical axis. Psychol Res. 2022; 87(3):894-918. PMC: 10017642. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-022-01693-9. View

Dalmaso M, Vicovaro M . Evidence of SQUARC and distance effects in a weight comparison task. Cogn Process. 2019; 20(2):163-173. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-019-00905-2. View

Dehaene S, Dupoux E, Mehler J . Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990; 16(3):626-41. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.3.626. View

de la Vega I, De Filippis M, Lachmair M, Dudschig C, Kaup B . Emotional valence and physical space: limits of interaction. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011; 38(2):375-85. DOI: 10.1037/a0024979. View

10.

Felisatti A, Laubrock J, Shaki S, Fischer M . A biological foundation for spatial-numerical associations: the brain's asymmetric frequency tuning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020; 1477(1):44-53. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14418. View

11.

Fischer M . The future for SNARC could be stark. Cortex. 2007; 42(8):1066-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70218-1. View

12.

Fischer M . Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex. 2008; 44(4):386-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.004. View

13.

Fischer M, Mills R, Shaki S . How to cook a SNARC: number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain Cogn. 2009; 72(3):333-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.010. View

14.

Gevers W, Reynvoet B, Fias W . The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition. 2003; 87(3):B87-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00234-2. View

15.

Giuliani F, Manippa V, Brancucci A, Palumbo R, Tommasi L, Pietroni D . How emotional is a banknote? The affective basis of money perception. Psychol Res. 2021; 85(8):3010-3025. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01457-3. View

16.

Holmes K, Lourenco S . Common spatial organization of number and emotional expression: a mental magnitude line. Brain Cogn. 2011; 77(2):315-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.002. View

17.

Hung Y, Hung D, Tzeng O, Wu D . Flexible spatial mapping of different notations of numbers in Chinese readers. Cognition. 2007; 106(3):1441-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.017. View

18.

Ishihara M, Keller P, Rossetti Y, Prinz W . Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex. 2008; 44(4):454-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.010. View

19.

Kong F . Space-valence associations depend on handedness: evidence from a bimanual output task. Psychol Res. 2013; 77(6):773-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0471-7. View

20.

Lidji P, Kolinsky R, Lochy A, Morais J . Spatial associations for musical stimuli: a piano in the head?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007; 33(5):1189-207. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1189. View