» Articles » PMID: 29272289

Robotic Exoskeleton Assessment of Transient Ischemic Attack

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Dec 23
PMID 29272289
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We used a robotic exoskeleton to quantify specific patterns of abnormal upper limb motor behaviour in people who have had transient ischemic attack (TIA). A cohort of people with TIA was recruited within two weeks of symptom onset. All individuals completed a robotic-based assessment of 8 behavioural tasks related to upper limb motor and proprioceptive function, as well as cognitive function. Robotic task performance was compared to a large cohort of controls without neurological impairments corrected for the influence of age. Impairment in people with TIA was defined as performance below the 5th percentile of controls. Participants with TIA were also assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment (CMSA) of the arm, the Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT), the Purdue pegboard test (PPB), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Age-related white matter change (ARWMC), prior infarction and cella-media index (CMI) were assessed from baseline CT scan that was performed within 24 hours of TIA. Acute infarction was assessed from diffusion-weighted imaging in a subset of people with TIA. Twenty-two people with TIA were assessed. Robotic assessment showed impaired upper limb motor function in 7/22 people with TIA patients and upper limb sensory impairment in 4/22 individuals. Cognitive tasks involving robotic assessment of the upper limb were completed in 13 participants, of whom 8 (61.5%) showed significant impairment. Abnormal performance in the CMSA arm inventory was present in 12/22 (54.5%) participants. ARWMC was 11.8 ± 6.4 and CMI was 5.4 ± 1.5. DWI was positive in 0 participants. Quantitative robotic assessment showed that people who have had a TIA display a spectrum of upper limb motor and sensory performance deficits as well as cognitive function deficits despite resolution of symptoms and no evidence of tissue infarction.

Citing Articles

Robotic Rigor: Validity of the Kinarm End-Point Robot Visually Guided Reaching Test in Multiple Sclerosis.

Bray N, Raza S, Avila J, Newell C, Ploughman M Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2025; 6(4):100382.

PMID: 39822195 PMC: 11733819. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100382.


Learning-to-learn as a metacognitive correlate of functional outcomes after stroke: a cohort study.

Sugiyama T, Uehara S, Yuasa A, Ushizawa K, Izawa J, Otaka Y Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024; 60(5):750-760.

PMID: 39073359 PMC: 11559250. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08446-6.


Task-residual effective connectivity of motor network in transient ischemic attack.

Chu T, Lee S, Jung I, Song Y, Kim H, Shin J Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):843.

PMID: 37580508 PMC: 10425379. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05212-3.


Impairments of the arm and hand are highly correlated during subacute stroke.

Reid L, Dukelow S, Scott S J Rehabil Med. 2023; 55:jrm2174.

PMID: 37219403 PMC: 10348056. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2174.


Altered Effective Connectivity of the Primary Motor Cortex in Transient Ischemic Attack.

Hao Z, Song Y, Shi Y, Xi H, Zhang H, Zhao M Neural Plast. 2022; 2022:2219993.

PMID: 36437903 PMC: 9699783. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2219993.


References
1.
Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S . Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke. 1993; 24(1):58-63. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.58. View

2.
Lex H, Weigelt M, Knoblauch A, Schack T . Functional relationship between cognitive representations of movement directions and visuomotor adaptation performance. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 223(4):457-67. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3273-7. View

3.
Tippett W, Sergio L . Visuomotor integration is impaired in early stage Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res. 2006; 1102(1):92-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.049. View

4.
Bock O, Girgenrath M . Relationship between sensorimotor adaptation and cognitive functions in younger and older subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 169(3):400-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0153-4. View

5.
Scott S, Dukelow S . Potential of robots as next-generation technology for clinical assessment of neurological disorders and upper-limb therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48(4):335-53. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.04.0057. View