» Articles » PMID: 29241944

Fracture Resistance and Failure Modes of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Endocrown Restorations with Variations in Margin Design and Occlusal Thickness

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 Dec 16
PMID 29241944
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of varying the margin designs and the occlusal thicknesses on the fracture resistance and mode of failures of endodontically treated teeth restored with polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations.

Methods: Root canal treated mandibular molars were divided into four groups (n=8) and were prepared to receive Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) fabricated polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrowns (ENAMIC blocks). Group B2 represents teeth prepared with a butt joint design receiving endocrowns with 2mm occlusal thickness and the same for group B3.5 but with 3.5mm occlusal thickness. Group S2 represents teeth prepared with 1mm shoulder finish line receiving endocrowns with 2mm occlusal thickness and the same for group S3.5 but with 3.5mm occlusal thickness. After cementation and thermal aging, fracture resistance test was performed and failure modes were observed.

Results: Group S3.5 showed the highest mean fracture load value (1.27±0.31kN). Endocrowns with shoulder finish line had significantly higher mean fracture resistance values than endocrowns with butt margin (p<0.05). However, the results were not statistically significant regarding the restoration thickness. Evaluation of the fracture modes revealed no statistically significant difference between the modes of failure of tested groups.

Conclusions: For the restoration of endodontically treated teeth, adding a short axial wall and shoulder finish line can increase the fracture resistance. However, further investigations, especially the fatigue behavior, are needed to ensure this effect applies with small increases of restoration thickness.

Citing Articles

Fracture resistance and failure-modes of endocrowns with two margin designs (butt versus shoulder) in primary molars: an in vitro study.

Saji S, Bansal K, Jain V, Mathur V, Tewari N, Morankar R Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025; .

PMID: 40055227 DOI: 10.1007/s40368-025-01017-6.


Dimensional accuracy of additive and subtractive manufactured ceramic-reinforced hybrid composite inlays: a CBCT-based in vitro study.

Daghrery A, Vinothkumar T, Majrashi H, Faqihi G, Gofshi R, Almasoudi S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6048.

PMID: 39972095 PMC: 11840043. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90611-1.


Effect of different restorative design on stress concentration of lithium disilicate and monolithic zirconia endocrown on a mandibular molar - a finite element analysis.

Karn G, Shetty M, Hegde C BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):205.

PMID: 39923024 PMC: 11806583. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05358-4.


Effect of pulp-chamber lateral wall thickness and number on fracture resistance in endocrown-restored molars: An in vitro study.

Li Z, Zhu J, Xu Y, Bao X, Wang X J Dent Sci. 2025; 20(1):470-476.

PMID: 39873008 PMC: 11762209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.05.012.


Beyond Traditional Restorations: Management With Endocrown in a Late Adolescent.

Binrayes A, AlGhazzi A, Alotaibi S Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74394.

PMID: 39677252 PMC: 11646561. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74394.