» Articles » PMID: 27212209

Technical Note: Computer-manufactured Inserts for Prosthetic Sockets

Overview
Journal Med Eng Phys
Date 2016 May 24
PMID 27212209
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this research was to use computer-aided design software and a tabletop 3-D additive manufacturing system to design and fabricate custom plastic inserts for trans-tibial prosthesis users. Shape quality of inserts was tested right after they were inserted into participant's test sockets and again after four weeks of wear. Inserts remained properly positioned and intact throughout testing. Right after insertion the inserts caused the socket to be slightly under-sized, by a mean of 0.11mm, approximately 55% of the thickness of a nylon sheath. After four weeks of wear the under-sizing was less, averaging 0.03mm, approximately 15% of the thickness of a nylon sheath. Thus the inserts settled into the sockets over time. If existing prosthetic design software packages were enhanced to conduct insert design and to automatically generate fabrication files for manufacturing, then computer manufactured inserts may offer advantages over traditional methods in terms of speed of fabrication, ease of design, modification, and record keeping.

Citing Articles

A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners.

Cagle J, Reinhall P, Allyn K, McLean J, Hinrichs P, Hafner B Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017; 56(7):1227-1240.

PMID: 29235055 PMC: 5999538. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1758-z.


Instrumented socket inserts for sensing interaction at the limb-socket interface.

Swanson E, McLean J, Allyn K, Redd C, Sanders J Med Eng Phys. 2017; 51:111-118.

PMID: 29229405 PMC: 5748260. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.11.006.

References
1.
Smith D, BURGESS E . The use of CAD/CAM technology in prosthetics and orthotics--current clinical models and a view to the future. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001; 38(3):327-34. View

2.
Sanders J, Severance M, Allyn K . Computer-socket manufacturing error: how much before it is clinically apparent?. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012; 49(4):567-82. PMC: 4432940. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.05.0097. View

3.
Saunders C, FOORT J, Bannon M, Lean D, Panych L . Computer aided design of prosthetic sockets for below-knee amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1985; 9(1):17-22. DOI: 10.3109/03093648509164819. View

4.
Holden J, Fernie G . Results of the pilot phase of a clinical evaluation of computer aided design of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1986; 10(3):142-8. DOI: 10.3109/03093648609164519. View

5.
Sanders J, Cagle J, Harrison D, Karchin A . Amputee socks: how does sock ply relate to sock thickness?. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012; 36(1):77-86. PMC: 4433011. DOI: 10.1177/0309364611431290. View