» Articles » PMID: 29211009

Selection of Meat Inspection Data for an Animal Welfare Index in Cattle and Pigs in Denmark

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2017 Dec 7
PMID 29211009
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

National welfare indices of cattle and pigs are constructed in Denmark, and meat inspection data may be used to contribute to these. We select potentially welfare-relevant abattoir recordings and assess the sources of variation within these with a view towards inclusion in the indices. Meat inspection codes were pre-selected based on expert judgement of having potential animal welfare relevance. Random effects logistic regression was then used to determine the magnitude of variation derived at the level of the farm or abattoir, of which farm variation might be associated with welfare, whereas abattoir variation is most likely caused by differences in recording practices. Codes were excluded for use in the indices based on poor model fit or a large abattoir effect. There was a large abattoir effect for most of the codes modelled and these codes were deemed to be not appropriate to be carried forward to the welfare index. A few were found to be potentially useful for a welfare index: Eight for slaughter pigs, 15 for sows, five for cattle <18 months of age, and six for older cattle. The absolute accuracy of each code/combination could not be assessed, only the relative variation between farms and abattoirs.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of candidate data-based welfare indicators for veal calves in Switzerland.

Zwygart S, Lutz B, Thomann B, Stucki D, Meylan M, Becker J Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1436719.

PMID: 39100759 PMC: 11295006. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1436719.


Can we use meat inspection data for animal health and welfare surveillance?.

Comin A, Jonasson A, Rockstrom U, Kautto A, Keeling L, Nyman A Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1129891.

PMID: 37234071 PMC: 10205995. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1129891.


Pathological Findings in Cattle Slaughtered in Northeastern Algeria and Associated Risk Factors.

Mimoune N, Hamiroune M, Boukhechem S, Mecherouk C, Harhoura K, Khelef D Vet Sci. 2022; 9(7).

PMID: 35878347 PMC: 9317034. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9070330.


A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Validated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle.

Stygar A, Gomez Y, Berteselli G, Dalla Costa E, Canali E, Niemi J Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:634338.

PMID: 33869317 PMC: 8044875. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.634338.


Legal Complexities of Animal Welfare in Australia: Do On-Animal Sensors Offer a Future Option?.

Manning J, Power D, Cosby A Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(1).

PMID: 33418954 PMC: 7825130. DOI: 10.3390/ani11010091.


References
1.
Houe H, Vaarst M, Enevoldsen C . Clinical parameters for assessment of udder health in Danish dairy herds. Acta Vet Scand. 2003; 43(3):173-84. View

2.
Enoe C, Christensen G, Andersen S, Willeberg P . The need for built-in validation of surveillance data so that changes in diagnostic performance of post-mortem meat inspection can be detected. Prev Vet Med. 2003; 57(3):117-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(02)00229-5. View

3.
Nielsen S, Michelsen A, Jensen H, Barington K, Opstrup K, Agger J . The apparent prevalence of skin lesions suspected to be human-inflicted in Danish finishing pigs at slaughter. Prev Vet Med. 2014; 117(1):200-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.003. View

4.
Nielsen S, Nielsen G, Denwood M, Haugegaard J, Houe H . Comparison of recording of pericarditis and lung disorders at routine meat inspection with findings at systematic health monitoring in Danish finisher pigs. Acta Vet Scand. 2015; 57:18. PMC: 4381412. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-015-0109-z. View