» Articles » PMID: 31766113

The Potential of Post-Mortem Carcass Assessments in Reflecting the Welfare of Beef and Dairy Cattle

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Nov 27
PMID 31766113
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is increasing interest in utilizing meat inspection data to help inform farmers of the health and welfare of their herds. The aim of this study was to determine whether ante-mortem measures of welfare in beef and dairy cattle (N = 305) were associated with post-mortem measures at a United Kingdom (UK) abattoir. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the ability of ante-mortem measures of lameness, cleanliness, skin lesions, hair loss and body condition in predicting hot carcass weight and the frequency of carcass bruising. For beef cattle, lameness score ( = 0.04), cleanliness score ( = 0.02) and age ( < 0.001), were predictors of carcass bruise score while lameness score ( = 0.03), body condition ( = 0.01) and sex ( < 0.001) were predictors of hot carcass weight. For dairy cattle, sex ( < 0.001) and slaughter day ( < 0.001) were predictors of carcass bruise score while skin lesion score ( = 0.01), body condition ( < 0.001), age ( < 0.001), slaughter day ( < 0.001) and number of moves ( = 0.01) were predictors of hot carcass weight. These results suggest that recording carcass weight and carcass bruising at meat inspection may have potential as a general indicator of health and welfare status in cattle. However, animal characteristics and variables, such as slaughter day and abattoir staffing, should be taken into account when interpreting the results.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of candidate data-based welfare indicators for veal calves in Switzerland.

Zwygart S, Lutz B, Thomann B, Stucki D, Meylan M, Becker J Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1436719.

PMID: 39100759 PMC: 11295006. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1436719.


Animal-based welfare indicators for dairy cows and their validity and practicality: a systematic review of the existing literature.

Linstadt J, Thone-Reineke C, Merle R Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1429097.

PMID: 39055860 PMC: 11271709. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1429097.


The Importance of the Slaughterhouse in Surveilling Animal and Public Health: A Systematic Review.

Garcia-Diez J, Saraiva S, Moura D, Grispoldi L, Cenci-Goga B, Saraiva C Vet Sci. 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36851472 PMC: 9959654. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10020167.


Welfare of cattle during transport.

Nielsen S, Alvarez J, Bicout D, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe J EFSA J. 2022; 20(9):e07442.

PMID: 36092766 PMC: 9449995. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7442.


Relationship between Bruises on Carcasses of Beef Cattle and Transport-Related Factors.

Zanardi E, De Luca S, Alborali G, Ianieri A, Varra M, Romeo C Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(15).

PMID: 35953986 PMC: 9367580. DOI: 10.3390/ani12151997.


References
1.
Strappini A, Metz J, Gallo C, Frankena K, Vargas R, de Freslon I . Bruises in culled cows: when, where and how are they inflicted?. Animal. 2012; 7(3):485-91. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112001863. View

2.
Vial F, Reist M . Evaluation of Swiss slaughterhouse data for integration in a syndromic surveillance system. BMC Vet Res. 2014; 10:33. PMC: 3922649. DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-33. View

3.
Huzzey J, Nydam D, Grant R, Overton T . The effects of overstocking Holstein dairy cattle during the dry period on cortisol secretion and energy metabolism. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95(8):4421-33. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-5037. View

4.
Vernon M . Demographics of cattle movements in the United Kingdom. BMC Vet Res. 2011; 7:31. PMC: 3148972. DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-7-31. View

5.
Strappini A, Frankena K, Metz J, Gallo B, Kemp B . Prevalence and risk factors for bruises in Chilean bovine carcasses. Meat Sci. 2010; 86(3):859-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.07.010. View