» Articles » PMID: 29209512

The ReSiT Study (reducing Sitting Time): Rationale and Protocol for an Exploratory Pilot Study of an Intervention to Reduce Sitting Time Among Office Workers

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Dec 7
PMID 29209512
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Desk-based workers engage in long periods of uninterrupted sitting time, which has been associated with morbidity and premature mortality. Previous workplace intervention trials have demonstrated the potential of providing sit-stand workstations, and of administering motivational behaviour change techniques, for reducing sitting time. Yet, few studies have combined these approaches or explored the acceptability of discrete sitting-reduction behaviour change strategies. This paper describes the rationale for a sitting-reduction intervention that combines sit-stand workstations with motivational techniques, and procedures for a pilot study to explore the acceptability of core intervention components among university office workers.

Methods: The intervention is based on a theory and evidence-based analysis of why office workers sit, and how best to reduce sitting time. It seeks to enhance motivation and capability, as well as identify opportunities, required to reduce sitting time. Thirty office workers will participate in the pilot study. They will complete an initial awareness-raising monitoring and feedback task and subsequently receive a sit-stand workstation for a 12-week period. They will also select from a 'menu' of behaviour change techniques tailored to self-declared barriers to sitting reduction, effectively co-producing and personally tailoring their intervention. Interviews at 1, 6, and 12 weeks post-intervention will explore intervention acceptability.

Discussion: To our knowledge, this will be the first study to explore direct feedback from office workers on the acceptability of discrete tailored sitting-reduction intervention components that they have received. Participants' choice of and reflections on intervention techniques will aid identification of strategies suitable for inclusion in the next iteration of the intervention, which will be delivered in a self-administered format to minimise resource burden.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN29395780 (registered 21 November 2016).

Citing Articles

Breaking the Habit? Identifying Discrete Dimensions of Sitting Automaticity and Their Responsiveness to a Sitting-Reduction Intervention.

Gardner B, Mainsbridge C, Rebar A, Cooley P, Honan C, OBrien J Int J Behav Med. 2023; 31(1):55-63.

PMID: 36750501 PMC: 10803392. DOI: 10.1007/s12529-023-10155-4.


The "Worktivity" mHealth intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled pilot study.

Stephenson A, Garcia-Constantino M, Murphy M, McDonough S, Nugent C, Mair J BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):1416.

PMID: 34275463 PMC: 8286585. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11473-6.


Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Breaking Up Sitting Time among Desk-Based Office Workers: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B.

Ojo S, Bailey D, Hewson D, Chater A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(16).

PMID: 31416112 PMC: 6720704. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162903.


Office workers' experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study.

Dewitt S, Hall J, Smith L, Buckley J, Biddle S, Mansfield L BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):819.

PMID: 31238902 PMC: 6593587. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7196-0.


Moving to an "Active" Biophilic Designed Office Workplace: A Pilot Study about the Effects on Sitting Time and Sitting Habits of Office-Based Workers.

Wallmann-Sperlich B, Hoffmann S, Salditt A, Bipp T, Froboese I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(9).

PMID: 31060203 PMC: 6539275. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16091559.

References
1.
Gardner B, Smith L, Mansfield L . How did the public respond to the 2015 expert consensus public health guidance statement on workplace sedentary behaviour? A qualitative analysis. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1):47. PMC: 5288998. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3974-0. View

2.
Gardner B, Davies A, McAteer J, Michie S . Beliefs underlying UK parents' views towards MMR promotion interventions: a qualitative study. Psychol Health Med. 2010; 15(2):220-30. DOI: 10.1080/13548501003623963. View

3.
Gardner B . A review and analysis of the use of 'habit' in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour. Health Psychol Rev. 2014; 9(3):277-95. PMC: 4566897. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2013.876238. View

4.
Mackenzie K, Goyder E, Eves F . Acceptability and feasibility of a low-cost, theory-based and co-produced intervention to reduce workplace sitting time in desk-based university employees. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:1294. PMC: 4690339. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2635-z. View

5.
Chau J, Daley M, Srinivasan A, Dunn S, Bauman A, van der Ploeg H . Desk-based workers' perspectives on using sit-stand workstations: a qualitative analysis of the Stand@Work study. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:752. PMC: 4125698. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-752. View