» Articles » PMID: 29196861

CRISPR-based Strategies for Studying Regulatory Elements and Chromatin Structure in Mammalian Gene Control

Overview
Journal Mamm Genome
Specialty Genetics
Date 2017 Dec 3
PMID 29196861
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development of high-throughput methods has enabled the genome-wide identification of putative regulatory elements in a wide variety of mammalian cells at an unprecedented resolution. Extensive genomic studies have revealed the important role of regulatory elements and genetic variation therein in disease formation and risk. In most cases, there is only correlative evidence for the roles of these elements and non-coding changes within these elements in pathogenesis. With the advent of genome- and epigenome-editing tools based on the CRISPR technology, it is now possible to test the functional relevance of the regulatory elements and alterations on a genomic scale. Here, we review the various CRISPR-based strategies that have been developed to functionally validate the candidate regulatory elements in mammals as well as the non-coding genetic variants found to be associated with human disease. We also discuss how these synthetic biology tools have helped to elucidate the role of three-dimensional nuclear architecture and higher-order chromatin organization in shaping functional genome and controlling gene expression.

Citing Articles

Deletion of a conserved genomic region associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis leads to vertebral rotation in mice.

McCallum-Loudeac J, Moody E, Williams J, Johnstone G, Sircombe K, Clarkson A Hum Mol Genet. 2024; 33(9):787-801.

PMID: 38280229 PMC: 11031364. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddae011.


Chromatin and Cancer: Implications of Disrupted Chromatin Organization in Tumorigenesis and Its Diversification.

Sehgal P, Chaturvedi P Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(2).

PMID: 36672415 PMC: 9856863. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020466.

References
1.
Ong C, Corces V . CTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2014; 15(4):234-46. PMC: 4610363. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3663. View

2.
Guo H, Cooper S, Friedman A . In Vivo Deletion of the Cebpa +37 kb Enhancer Markedly Reduces Cebpa mRNA in Myeloid Progenitors but Not in Non-Hematopoietic Tissues to Impair Granulopoiesis. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0150809. PMC: 4777376. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150809. View

3.
Ghirlando R, Felsenfeld G . CTCF: making the right connections. Genes Dev. 2016; 30(8):881-91. PMC: 4840295. DOI: 10.1101/gad.277863.116. View

4.
Rhee H, Closser M, Guo Y, Bashkirova E, Tan G, Gifford D . Expression of Terminal Effector Genes in Mammalian Neurons Is Maintained by a Dynamic Relay of Transient Enhancers. Neuron. 2016; 92(6):1252-1265. PMC: 5193225. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.037. View

5.
Luo Z, Rhie S, Lay F, Farnham P . A Prostate Cancer Risk Element Functions as a Repressive Loop that Regulates HOXA13. Cell Rep. 2017; 21(6):1411-1417. PMC: 5726543. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.048. View