On the Interpretation and Use of Mediation: Multiple Perspectives on Mediation Analysis

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2017 Dec 1

PMID 29187828

Citations 94

Authors

Robert Agler

Paul De Boeck

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Mediation analysis has become a very popular approach in psychology, and it is one that is associated with multiple perspectives that are often at odds, often implicitly. Explicitly discussing these perspectives and their motivations, advantages, and disadvantages can help to provide clarity to conversations and research regarding the use and refinement of mediation models. We discuss five such pairs of perspectives on mediation analysis, their associated advantages and disadvantages, and their implications: with vs. without a mediation hypothesis, specific effects vs. a global model, directness vs. indirectness of causation, effect size vs. null hypothesis testing, and hypothesized vs. alternative explanations. Discussion of the perspectives is facilitated by a small simulation study. Some philosophical and linguistic considerations are briefly discussed, as well as some other perspectives we do not develop here.

Citing Articles

Future anxiety and the motives for postponing parenthood: generational time perspective and life satisfaction as mediators.

Szczesniak M, Timoszyk-Tomczak C, Los J, Grzeczka M Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1441927.

PMID: 40013257 PMC: 11859578. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1441927.

A systematic review of mediation analysis frameworks in studies examining the determinants of cardiometabolic outcomes in people living with HIV.

Ebasone P, Peer N, Dzudie A, Foaleng M, Melpsa J, Kengne A BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025; 25(1):41.

PMID: 39979870 PMC: 11844112. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-025-02498-1.

Study and personal resources of university students' academic resilience and the relationship with positive psychological outcomes.

Bagdziuniene D, Zukauskaite I, Bulotaite L, Sargautyte R Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1517359.

PMID: 39973962 PMC: 11835835. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1517359.

From information to action: modelling social and cognitive factors in health decisions.

Yu J, Bekerian D BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):508.

PMID: 39920594 PMC: 11806782. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21721-8.

The mediating role of workplace milieu resources on the relationship between emotional intelligence and burnout among leaders in social care.

Kozak A, Schutzmann R, Soltesz-Varhelyi K, Albert F PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317280.

PMID: 39888890 PMC: 11785285. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317280.

References

MacKinnon D, Krull J, Lockwood C . Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci. 2001; 1(4):173-81. PMC: 2819361. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026595011371. View

Kraemer H, Wilson G, Fairburn C, Agras W . Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002; 59(10):877-83. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877. View

Shrout P, Bolger N . Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2003; 7(4):422-45. View

Kerr N . HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2005; 2(3):196-217. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4. View

Muller D, Judd C, Yzerbyt V . When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 89(6):852-63. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852. View

Fritz M, MacKinnon D . Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(3):233-9. PMC: 2843527. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x. View

Kraemer H, Kiernan M, Essex M, Kupfer D . How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches. Health Psychol. 2008; 27(2S):S101-8. PMC: 3376898. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2(Suppl.).S101. View

Preacher K, Hayes A . Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(3):879-91. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. View

Jo B . Causal inference in randomized experiments with mediational processes. Psychol Methods. 2008; 13(4):314-36. PMC: 2927874. DOI: 10.1037/a0014207. View

10.

MacKinnon D, Lockwood C, Williams J . Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behav Res. 2010; 39(1):99. PMC: 2821115. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4. View

11.

Bullock J, Green D, Ha S . Yes, but what's the mechanism? (don't expect an easy answer). J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 98(4):550-8. DOI: 10.1037/a0018933. View

12.

VanderWeele T . Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2010; 21(4):540-51. PMC: 4231822. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181df191c. View

13.

Preacher K, Zyphur M, Zhang Z . A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychol Methods. 2010; 15(3):209-33. DOI: 10.1037/a0020141. View

14.

Wagenmakers E, Wetzels R, Borsboom D, van der Maas H . Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011; 100(3):426-32. DOI: 10.1037/a0022790. View

15.

Preacher K, Kelley K . Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychol Methods. 2011; 16(2):93-115. DOI: 10.1037/a0022658. View

16.

Borsboom D, Cramer A . Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013; 9:91-121. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608. View

17.

Hayes A, Scharkow M . The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(10):1918-27. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613480187. View

18.

Yuan Y, MacKinnon D . Robust mediation analysis based on median regression. Psychol Methods. 2013; 19(1):1-20. PMC: 3969875. DOI: 10.1037/a0033820. View

19.

Kenny D, Judd C . Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychol Sci. 2013; 25(2):334-9. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613502676. View

20.

ORourke H, MacKinnon D . When the test of mediation is more powerful than the test of the total effect. Behav Res Methods. 2014; 47(2):424-42. PMC: 4258193. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0481-z. View