» Articles » PMID: 29183777

Sensory and Semantic Activations Evoked by Action Attributes of Manipulable Objects: Evidence from ERPs

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Nov 30
PMID 29183777
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

"Two route" theories of object-related action processing posit different temporal activation profiles of grasp-to-move actions (rapidly evoked based on object structure) versus skilled use actions (more slowly activated based on semantic knowledge). We capitalized on the exquisite temporal resolution and multidimensionality of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) to directly test this hypothesis. Participants viewed manipulable objects (e.g., calculator) preceded by objects sharing either "grasp", "use", or no action attributes (e.g., bar of soap, keyboard, earring, respectively), as well as by action-unrelated but taxonomically-related objects (e.g., abacus); participants judged whether the two objects were related. The results showed more positive responses to "grasp-to-move" primed objects than "skilled use" primed objects or unprimed objects starting in the P1 (0-150 ms) time window and continuing onto the subsequent N1 and P2 components (150-300 ms), suggesting that only "grasp-to-move", but not "skilled use", actions may facilitate visual attention to object attributes. Furthermore, reliably reduced N400s (300-500 ms), an index of semantic processing, were observed to taxonomically primed and "skilled use" primed objects relative to unprimed objects, suggesting that "skilled use" action attributes are a component of distributed, multimodal semantic representations of objects. Together, our findings provide evidence supporting two-route theories by demonstrating that "grasp-to-move" and "skilled use" actions impact different aspects of object processing and highlight the relationship of "skilled use" information to other aspects of semantic memory.

Citing Articles

No need to integrate action information during coarse semantic processing of man-made tools.

Yu W, Ni L, Zhang Z, Zheng W, Liu Y Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 30(6):2230-2239.

PMID: 37221279 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02301-6.


The different effects of breaking an object at different time points.

Zou M, Hu S, Hai M, Li Y, Wang Y Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 30(3):942-952.

PMID: 36403168 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02210-0.


The dominant role of functional action representation in object recognition.

Ni L, Liu Y, Yu W Exp Brain Res. 2018; 237(2):363-375.

PMID: 30413842 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5426-9.

References
1.
Kutas M, Hillyard S . Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 1980; 207(4427):203-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.7350657. View

2.
Buxbaum L, Sirigu A, Schwartz M, Klatzky R . Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia. 2003; 41(8):1091-113. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00314-7. View

3.
Valyear K, Chapman C, Gallivan J, Mark R, Culham J . To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 212(1):125-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2705-0. View

4.
Mahon B, Milleville S, Negri G, Rumiati R, Caramazza A, Martin A . Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron. 2007; 55(3):507-20. PMC: 2000824. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.011. View

5.
Gallese V, Lakoff G . The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 22(3):455-79. DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000310. View