The Dominant Role of Functional Action Representation in Object Recognition

Overview

Journal Exp Brain Res

Specialty Neurology

Date 2018 Nov 11

PMID 30413842

Citations 6

Authors

Long Ni

Ye Liu

Wenyuan Yu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Action representation of manipulable objects has been found to be involved in object recognition. Recently, studies have indicated the existence of two distinct action systems: functional action specifying how to use an object and structural action concerning how to grasp an object. Despite evidence revealing the systems' anatomical and functional differences, few preceding studies have dissociated their respective roles in object recognition. The present study aimed to tease apart their roles in the recognition of manipulable objects with a priming paradigm. Specifically, we used static stimuli (photos, Experiments 1 and 2) and dynamic stimuli (video clips, Experiments 3 and 4) depicting functional and structural action hand gestures as primes and measured the magnitude of functional and structural action priming effect in object recognition. We found that static and dynamic priming stimuli induced a robust action priming effect only for functional action prime-target pairs. Naming latencies of the target objects were shorter when functional action representations of the prime and target were congruent than when they were incongruent. Moreover, as compared to static priming photos, dynamic priming stimuli induced a larger functional action priming effect. By contrast, neither static nor dynamic priming stimuli elicited a structural action priming effect. Behavioral data from our four experiments provide consistent evidence of the dominant role of functional action representation in the recognition of manipulable objects, suggesting that action knowledge regarding how to use rather than grasp an object is more likely an intrinsic component of objects' conceptual representation.

Citing Articles

Anticipation (second-order motor planning) is stored in memory - processing of grasp postures in a priming paradigm.

Kampfer J, Vogel L, Schack T Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1393254.

PMID: 39086432 PMC: 11289885. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1393254.

No need to integrate action information during coarse semantic processing of man-made tools.

Yu W, Ni L, Zhang Z, Zheng W, Liu Y Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 30(6):2230-2239.

PMID: 37221279 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02301-6.

Tool use acquisition induces a multifunctional interference effect during object processing: evidence from the sensorimotor mu rhythm.

Foerster F Exp Brain Res. 2023; 241(4):1145-1157.

PMID: 36920527 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06595-9.

Spatio-Temporal Neural Dynamics of Observing Non-Tool Manipulable Objects and Interactions.

Li Z, Iramina K Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(20).

PMID: 36298121 PMC: 9611388. DOI: 10.3390/s22207771.

Looking to recognise: the pre-eminence of semantic over sensorimotor processing in human tool use.

Federico G, Brandimonte M Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):6157.

PMID: 32273576 PMC: 7145874. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63045-0.

References

Chao L, Martin A . Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage. 2000; 12(4):478-84. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0635. View

Gerlach C, Law I, Paulson O . When action turns into words. Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002; 14(8):1230-9. DOI: 10.1162/089892902760807221. View

Grezes J, Tucker M, Armony J, Ellis R, Passingham R . Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur J Neurosci. 2003; 17(12):2735-40. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02695.x. View

Goodale M, Milner A . Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992; 15(1):20-5. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8. View

Rizzolatti G, Matelli M . Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 153(2):146-57. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1588-0. View

Wolk D, Coslett H, Glosser G . The role of sensory-motor information in object recognition: evidence from category-specific visual agnosia. Brain Lang. 2005; 94(2):131-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.015. View

Myung J, Blumstein S, Sedivy J . Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition. 2006; 98(3):223-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010. View

Helbig H, Graf M, Kiefer M . The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 174(2):221-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0443-5. View

Borghi A, Bonfiglioli C, Lugli L, Ricciardelli P, Rubichi S, Nicoletti R . Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes. Neurosci Lett. 2006; 411(1):17-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.003. View

10.

Bub D, Masson M, Cree G . Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition. 2007; 106(1):27-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.010. View

11.

Creem-Regehr S, Dilda V, Vicchrilli A, Federer F, Lee J . The influence of complex action knowledge on representations of novel graspable objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007; 13(6):1009-20. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617707071093. View

12.

Vingerhoets G . Knowing about tools: neural correlates of tool familiarity and experience. Neuroimage. 2008; 40(3):1380-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.058. View

13.

Vainio L, Symes E, Ellis R, Tucker M, Ottoboni G . On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition. 2008; 108(2):444-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.007. View

14.

Masson M, Bub D, Newton-Taylor M . Language-based access to gestural components of conceptual knowledge. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008; 61(6):869-82. DOI: 10.1080/17470210701623829. View

15.

Rueschemeyer S, van Rooij D, Lindemann O, Willems R, Bekkering H . The function of words: distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 22(8):1844-51. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21310. View

16.

Helbig H, Steinwender J, Graf M, Kiefer M . Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res. 2009; 200(3-4):251-8. PMC: 2820217. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1953-8. View

17.

Chouinard P, Goodale M . Category-specific neural processing for naming pictures of animals and naming pictures of tools: an ALE meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 48(2):409-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.032. View

18.

Jax S, Buxbaum L . Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. Cognition. 2010; 115(2):350-5. PMC: 2837086. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.004. View

19.

Buxbaum L, Kalenine S . Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1191:201-18. PMC: 4311774. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05447.x. View

20.

Almeida J, Mahon B, Caramazza A . The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(6):772-8. PMC: 2908271. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610371343. View