» Articles » PMID: 29160897

Social Integration and Survival After Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Nov 22
PMID 29160897
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although larger social networks have been associated with lower all-cause mortality, few studies have examined whether social integration predicts survival outcomes among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The authors examined the association between social ties and survival after CRC diagnosis in a prospective cohort study.

Methods: Participants included 896 women in the Nurses' Health Study who were diagnosed with stage I, II, or III CRC between 1992 and 2012. Stage was assigned using the American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria. Social integration was assessed every 4 years since 1992 using the Berkman-Syme Social Network Index, which included marital status, social network size, contact frequency, religious participation, and other social group participation.

Results: During follow-up, there were 380 total deaths, 167 of which were due to CRC. In multivariable analyses, women who were socially integrated before diagnosis had a subsequent reduced risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.46-0.92) and CRC mortality (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.38-1.06) compared with women who were socially isolated. In particular, women with more intimate ties (family and friends) had lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88) and CRC mortality (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.34-1.03) compared with those with few intimate ties. Participation in religious or community activities was not found to be related to outcomes. The analysis of postdiagnosis social integration yielded similar results.

Conclusions: Socially integrated women were found to have better survival after a diagnosis of CRC, possibly due to beneficial caregiving from their family and friends. Interventions aimed at strengthening social network structures to ensure access to care may be valuable programmatic tools in the management of patients with CRC. Cancer 2018;124:833-40. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Citing Articles

Network of job demands-resources and depressive symptoms in critical care nurses: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Li X, Tian Y, Yang J, Ning M, Chen Z, Yu Q Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):39.

PMID: 39838475 PMC: 11753002. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05282-1.


Social supports in patients with cancer attending an Irish cancer center: a cross-sectional study.

Goggin C, Ged Y, Bracken-Clarke D, Hannan M, Calacsan F, Jordan E Oncologist. 2024; 29(11):e1621-e1625.

PMID: 39121387 PMC: 11546626. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae196.


Social Determinants of Health and the Link to Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.

Lorentsen M, Sanoff H Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024; 25(4):453-464.

PMID: 38498252 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01191-7.


Association between social background and implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancers, sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study.

Bekki T, Shimomura M, Saito Y, Nakahara M, Adachi T, Ikeda S Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 39(1):11.

PMID: 38153518 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04583-7.


The association of cancer-related fatigue on the social, vocational and healthcare-related dimensions of cancer survivorship.

Jones J, Howell D, Longo C, Olson K, Bedard P, Amir E J Cancer Surviv. 2023; 19(1):97-108.

PMID: 37644355 PMC: 11813975. DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01451-9.


References
1.
Waxler-Morrison N, Hislop T, Mears B, Kan L . Effects of social relationships on survival for women with breast cancer: a prospective study. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 33(2):177-83. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90178-f. View

2.
de Boer M, Ryckman R, Pruyn J, van den Borne H . Psychosocial correlates of cancer relapse and survival: a literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 37(3):215-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00029-4. View

3.
Goodwin J, Samet J, Hunt W . Determinants of survival in older cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88(15):1031-8. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.15.1031. View

4.
Lutgendorf S, Andersen B . Biobehavioral approaches to cancer progression and survival: Mechanisms and interventions. Am Psychol. 2015; 70(2):186-97. PMC: 4347942. DOI: 10.1037/a0035730. View

5.
Bao Y, Bertoia M, Lenart E, Stampfer M, Willett W, Speizer F . Origin, Methods, and Evolution of the Three Nurses' Health Studies. Am J Public Health. 2016; 106(9):1573-81. PMC: 4981810. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303338. View