» Articles » PMID: 29149564

Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics Calculations Using Chemical Host and Guest: A Comprehensive Picture of Molecular Recognition

Overview
Specialties Biochemistry
Chemistry
Date 2017 Nov 18
PMID 29149564
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding the fine balance between changes of entropy and enthalpy and the competition between a guest and water molecules in molecular binding is crucial in fundamental studies and practical applications. Experiments provide measurements. However, illustrating the binding/unbinding processes gives a complete picture of molecular recognition not directly available from experiments, and computational methods bridge the gaps. Here, we investigated guest association/dissociation with β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) by using microsecond-time-scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, postanalysis and numerical calculations. We computed association and dissociation rate constants, enthalpy, and solvent and solute entropy of binding. All the computed values of k, k, ΔH, ΔS, and ΔG using GAFF-CD and q4MD-CD force fields for β-CD could be compared with experimental data directly and agreed reasonably with experiment findings. In addition, our study further interprets experiments. Both force fields resulted in similar computed ΔG from independently computed kinetics rates, ΔG = -RT ln(k·C/k), and thermodynamics properties, ΔG = ΔH - TΔS. The water entropy calculations show that the entropy gain of desolvating water molecules are a major driving force, and both force fields have the same strength of nonpolar attractions between solutes and β-CD as well. Water molecules play a crucial role in guest binding to β-CD. However, collective water/β-CD motions could contribute to different computed k and ΔH values by different force fields, mainly because the parameters of β-CD provide different motions of β-CD, hydrogen-bond networks of water molecules in the cavity of free β-CD, and strength of desolvation penalty. As a result, q4MD-CD suggests that guest binding is mostly driven by enthalpy, while GAFF-CD shows that gaining entropy is the major driving force of binding. The study deepens our understanding of ligand-receptor recognition and suggests strategies for force field parametrization for accurately modeling molecular systems.

Citing Articles

Kinetic-thermodynamic correlation of conformational changes in ammonium complexes of a flexible naphthocage.

He S, Quan M, Yang L, Au-Yeung H, Jiang W Chem Sci. 2024; .

PMID: 39282639 PMC: 11391410. DOI: 10.1039/d4sc02831g.


Roles of Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Predictions of Binding Kinetic Parameters.

Chen J, Wang W, Sun H, He W Mini Rev Med Chem. 2024; 24(14):1323-1333.

PMID: 38265367 DOI: 10.2174/0113895575252165231122095555.


QMrebind: incorporating quantum mechanical force field reparameterization at the ligand binding site for improved drug-target kinetics through milestoning simulations.

Ojha A, Votapka L, Amaro R Chem Sci. 2023; 14(45):13159-13175.

PMID: 38023523 PMC: 10664576. DOI: 10.1039/d3sc04195f.


Ligand Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics 2 (LiGaMD2): Improved Calculations of Ligand Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics with Closed Protein Pocket.

Wang J, Miao Y J Chem Theory Comput. 2023; 19(3):733-745.

PMID: 36706316 PMC: 10316156. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01194.


Binding Kinetics Toolkit for Analyzing Transient Molecular Conformations and Computing Free Energy Landscapes.

Ruzmetov T, Montes R, Sun J, Chen S, Tang Z, Chang C J Phys Chem A. 2022; 126(46):8761-8770.

PMID: 36346951 PMC: 10355345. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c05499.


References
1.
Beauchamp K, Lin Y, Das R, Pande V . Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements. J Chem Theory Comput. 2012; 8(4):1409-1414. PMC: 3383641. DOI: 10.1021/ct2007814. View

2.
Sykes D, Dowling M, Charlton S . Exploring the mechanism of agonist efficacy: a relationship between efficacy and agonist dissociation rate at the muscarinic M3 receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2009; 76(3):543-51. DOI: 10.1124/mol.108.054452. View

3.
Wickstrom L, He P, Gallicchio E, Levy R . Large scale affinity calculations of cyclodextrin host-guest complexes: Understanding the role of reorganization in the molecular recognition process. J Chem Theory Comput. 2014; 9(7):3136-3150. PMC: 4137772. DOI: 10.1021/ct400003r. View

4.
Schneider E, Bottcher J, Huber R, Maskos K, Neumann L . Structure-kinetic relationship study of CDK8/CycC specific compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(20):8081-6. PMC: 3657768. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305378110. View

5.
Guo D, Mulder-Krieger T, IJzerman A, Heitman L . Functional efficacy of adenosine A₂A receptor agonists is positively correlated to their receptor residence time. Br J Pharmacol. 2012; 166(6):1846-59. PMC: 3402809. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01897.x. View