» Articles » PMID: 17242351

Ligand Configurational Entropy and Protein Binding

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2007 Jan 24
PMID 17242351
Citations 135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The restriction of a small molecule's motion on binding to a protein causes a loss of configurational entropy, and thus a penalty in binding affinity. Some energy models used in computer-aided ligand design neglect this entropic penalty, whereas others account for it based on an expected drop in the number of accessible rotamers upon binding. However, the validity of the physical assumptions underlying the various approaches is largely unexamined. The present study addresses this issue by using Mining Minima calculations to analyze the association of amprenavir with HIV protease. The computed loss in ligand configurational entropy is large, contributing approximately 25 kcal/mol (4.184 kJ/kcal) to DeltaG degrees. Most of this loss results from narrower energy wells in the bound state, rather than a drop in the number of accessible rotamers. Coupling among rotation/translation and internal degrees of freedom complicates the decomposition of the entropy change into additive terms. The results highlight the potential to gain affinity by designing conformationally restricted ligands and have implications for the formulation of energy models for ligand scoring.

Citing Articles

Structural Basis for the Improved RNA Clamping of Amidino-Rocaglates to eIF4A1.

Conley J, Brown L, McNeely J, Pelletier J, Porco Jr J, Allen K ACS Omega. 2025; 10(6):5795-5808.

PMID: 39989799 PMC: 11840593. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c09421.


Inhibitory Potential and Binding Thermodynamics of Scyllatoxin-Based BH3 Domain Mimetics Targeting Repressor BCL2 Proteins.

Amarasiri H, Arachchige D, Vince M, Holub J J Mol Recognit. 2025; 38(2):e70001.

PMID: 39905677 PMC: 11794977. DOI: 10.1002/jmr.70001.


Expanding Automated Multiconformer Ligand Modeling to Macrocycles and Fragments.

Flowers J, Echols N, Correy G, Jaishankar P, Togo T, Renslo A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39386683 PMC: 11463535. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.20.613996.


Emerging Conformational-Analysis Protocols from the RTCONF55-16K Reaction Thermochemistry Conformational Benchmark Set.

Meszaros B, Kubicsko K, Nemeth D, Daru J J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 20(17):7385-7392.

PMID: 38899777 PMC: 11498139. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00565.


Computer-aided molecular design and optimization of potent inhibitors disrupting APC‒Asef interaction.

Wang X, Du Z, Guo Y, Zhong J, Song K, Wang J Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024; 14(6):2631-2645.

PMID: 38828145 PMC: 11143523. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.03.020.


References
1.
David L, Luo R, Gilson M . Ligand-receptor docking with the Mining Minima optimizer. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2001; 15(2):157-71. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008128723048. View

2.
Lazaridis T, Masunov A, Gandolfo F . Contributions to the binding free energy of ligands to avidin and streptavidin. Proteins. 2002; 47(2):194-208. DOI: 10.1002/prot.10086. View

3.
Chen W, Huang J, Gilson M . Identification of symmetries in molecules and complexes. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004; 44(4):1301-13. DOI: 10.1021/ci049966a. View

4.
Doig A, STERNBERG M . Side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding. Protein Sci. 1995; 4(11):2247-51. PMC: 2143028. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560041101. View

5.
Houk K, Leach A, Kim S, Zhang X . Binding affinities of host-guest, protein-ligand, and protein-transition-state complexes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2003; 42(40):4872-97. DOI: 10.1002/anie.200200565. View