» Articles » PMID: 29149033

Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2017 Nov 18
PMID 29149033
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dietary factors play a major role in the development of colorectal cancer. This study evaluated the reproducibility and validity of a 109-food item Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to measure the consumption of foods and nutrients related to the development of colorectal cancer in a population aged ≥50 years in Flanders, Belgium. A semi-quantitative FFQ was administered two times in a period of two weeks to evaluate reproducibility (FFQ1 and FFQ2). The validity of the FFQ was assessed by comparing FFQ1 against the 3-day diary method (3 DD). A total of 162 respondents (mean age 57.5 years) provided data for the FFQ, of whom 156 also participated in the validity assessment. Mean differences in the intake of foods and nutrients between FFQ1 and FFQ2 were, overall, small and statistically insignificant. However, a higher estimation was observed by FFQ1 as compared to the 3-DD method for the majority of food groups and nutrient intake in the validity assessment. A systematic mean difference (g/day) was observed for eight food groups in the Bland-Altman agreement test; the largest was for fruit intake. Regarding the nutrients, a systematic mean difference was observed in calcium, fat, and vitamin D intake. Overall, the reproducibility of the FFQ was good, and its validity could be satisfactory for estimating absolute food and nutrient intakes and ranking individuals according to high and low intake categories.

Citing Articles

Validation of food frequency questionnaire for food intake of adults in Gida, West, Ethiopia.

Fikadu W, Mulugeta S, Dejene Y Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1438008.

PMID: 39668953 PMC: 11634883. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438008.


Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to determine dietary intakes among Lebanese athletes.

Sannan N, Papazian T, Issa Z, El Helou N PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0311617.

PMID: 39441871 PMC: 11498687. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311617.


Association between Nutrition Behavior and Colorectal Cancer Diet Recommendation.

Laguerre E, Matthews T J Cancer Prev. 2022; 27(2):79-88.

PMID: 35864857 PMC: 9271404. DOI: 10.15430/JCP.2022.27.2.79.


Impacts of dietary exposure to pesticides on faecal microbiome metabolism in adult twins.

Mesnage R, Bowyer R, El Balkhi S, Saint-Marcoux F, Gardere A, Ducarmon Q Environ Health. 2022; 21(1):46.

PMID: 35501856 PMC: 9063241. DOI: 10.1186/s12940-022-00860-0.


Reproducibility and feasibility of an online self-administered food frequency questionnaire for use among adult Norwegians.

Carlsen M, Andersen L, Hjartaker A Food Nutr Res. 2021; 65.

PMID: 34908922 PMC: 8634621. DOI: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7561.


References
1.
Sofi F, Cesari F, Abbate R, Gensini G, Casini A . Adherence to Mediterranean diet and health status: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1344. PMC: 2533524. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1344. View

2.
Fallaize R, Forster H, Macready A, Walsh M, Mathers J, Brennan L . Online dietary intake estimation: reproducibility and validity of the Food4Me food frequency questionnaire against a 4-day weighed food record. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(8):e190. PMC: 4147714. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3355. View

3.
Keum N, Aune D, Greenwood D, Ju W, Giovannucci E . Calcium intake and colorectal cancer risk: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135(8):1940-8. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28840. View

4.
Streppel M, de Vries J, Meijboom S, Beekman M, de Craen A, Slagboom P . Relative validity of the food frequency questionnaire used to assess dietary intake in the Leiden Longevity Study. Nutr J. 2013; 12:75. PMC: 3680188. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-75. View

5.
Brinkman M, Kellen E, Zeegers M, van Dongen M, Dagnelie P, Muls E . Validation of the IMMIDIET food frequency questionnaire in an adult Belgian population: a report from the Belgian case-control study on bladder cancer risk. Acta Clin Belg. 2011; 66(1):18-25. DOI: 10.2143/ACB.66.1.2062509. View