» Articles » PMID: 29143810

Next-generation Pacemakers: from Small Devices to Biological Pacemakers

Overview
Journal Nat Rev Cardiol
Date 2017 Nov 17
PMID 29143810
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electrogenesis in the heart begins in the sinoatrial node and proceeds down the conduction system to originate the heartbeat. Conduction system disorders lead to slow heart rates that are insufficient to support the circulation, necessitating implantation of electronic pacemakers. The typical electronic pacemaker consists of a subcutaneous generator and battery module attached to one or more endocardial leads. New leadless pacemakers can be implanted directly into the right ventricular apex, providing single-chamber pacing without a subcutaneous generator. Modern pacemakers are generally reliable, and their programmability provides options for different pacing modes tailored to specific clinical needs. Advances in device technology will probably include alternative energy sources and dual-chamber leadless pacing in the not-too-distant future. Although effective, current electronic devices have limitations related to lead or generator malfunction, lack of autonomic responsiveness, undesirable interactions with strong magnetic fields, and device-related infections. Biological pacemakers, generated by somatic gene transfer, cell fusion, or cell transplantation, provide an alternative to electronic devices. Somatic reprogramming strategies, which involve transfer of genes encoding transcription factors to transform working myocardium into a surrogate sinoatrial node, are furthest along in the translational pipeline. Even as electronic pacemakers become smaller and less invasive, biological pacemakers might expand the therapeutic armamentarium for conduction system disorders.

Citing Articles

iPSC-Derived Biological Pacemaker-From Bench to Bedside.

Vo Q, Nakamura K, Saito Y, Iida T, Yoshida M, Amioka N Cells. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768137 PMC: 11674228. DOI: 10.3390/cells13242045.


Decoding the molecular, cellular, and functional heterogeneity of zebrafish intracardiac nervous system.

Pedroni A, Yilmaz E, Del Vecchio L, Bhattarai P, Vidal I, Dai Y Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10483.

PMID: 39632839 PMC: 11618350. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54830-w.


Compound Tongyang Fumai decoction improves quality of life in sick sinus syndrome: a randomized controlled study.

Qiaomin W, Xuanke G, Jinfeng L, Yanli W, Xing C, Zhiming L J Tradit Chin Med. 2024; 44(6):1247-1253.

PMID: 39617710 PMC: 11589543. DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2024.06.010.


Structure-Function Relationship of the Ryanodine Receptor Cluster Network in Sinoatrial Node Cells.

Maltsev A, Ventura Subirachs V, Monfredi O, Juhaszova M, Ajay Warrier P, Rakshit S Cells. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39594633 PMC: 11592670. DOI: 10.3390/cells13221885.


Differentiation of Sinoatrial-like Cardiomyocytes as a Biological Pacemaker Model.

Sleiman Y, Reisqs J, Boutjdir M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(17).

PMID: 39273104 PMC: 11394733. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25179155.


References
1.
Ionta V, Liang W, Kim E, Rafie R, Giacomello A, Marban E . SHOX2 overexpression favors differentiation of embryonic stem cells into cardiac pacemaker cells, improving biological pacing ability. Stem Cell Reports. 2014; 4(1):129-142. PMC: 4297875. DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.11.004. View

2.
Tse H, Xue T, Lau C, Siu C, Wang K, Zhang Q . Bioartificial sinus node constructed via in vivo gene transfer of an engineered pacemaker HCN Channel reduces the dependence on electronic pacemaker in a sick-sinus syndrome model. Circulation. 2006; 114(10):1000-11. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.615385. View

3.
Bucchi A, Plotnikov A, Shlapakova I, Danilo Jr P, Kryukova Y, Qu J . Wild-type and mutant HCN channels in a tandem biological-electronic cardiac pacemaker. Circulation. 2006; 114(10):992-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.617613. View

4.
Xue T, Cho H, Akar F, Tsang S, Jones S, Marban E . Functional integration of electrically active cardiac derivatives from genetically engineered human embryonic stem cells with quiescent recipient ventricular cardiomyocytes: insights into the development of cell-based pacemakers. Circulation. 2004; 111(1):11-20. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151313.18547.A2. View

5.
Baddour L, Epstein A, Erickson C, Knight B, Levison M, Lockhart P . Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010; 121(3):458-77. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192665. View