» Articles » PMID: 27296508

Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation After Lead Extraction in Patients With Severe Device Infection

Overview
Date 2016 Jun 15
PMID 27296508
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Conventional pacemaker therapy is limited by short- and long-term complications, most notably device infection. Transcatheter pacing systems (TPS) may be beneficial in this kind of patients as they eliminate the need for a device pocket and leads and thus may reduce the risk of re-infection.

Methods: We assessed a novel procedure in 6 patients with severe device infection who were pacemaker dependent. After lead extraction a single chamber TPS was implanted into the right ventricle.

Results: Of the 6 patients who underwent lead extraction due to severe device infection at our institution, 3 were diagnosed with a pocket infection only, whereas the other 3 showed symptoms of both pocket and lead infection. Successful lead extraction and TPS implantation was accomplished in all patients. Four patients were bridged with a temporary pacemaker between 2 hours and 2 days after lead extraction, whereas 2 patients had the TPS implanted during the same procedure just before traditional pacemaker system removal. All patients stayed free of infection during the follow-up period of 12 weeks. An additional positron emission tomography scan was performed in each patient and indicated no signs of an infection around the TPS.

Conclusion: Transcather pacemaker implantation was safe and feasible in 6 patients and did not result in re-infection even if implanted before removal of the infected pacemaker system within the same procedure. Therefore, implantation of a TPS may be an option for patients with severe device infection, especially in those with blocked venous access or who are pacemaker dependent.

Citing Articles

Assessment of adverse events stratified by timing of leadless pacemaker implantation with cardiac implantable electronic devices extraction due to infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Inoue N, Ito Y, Imaizumi T, Morikawa S, Murohara T J Arrhythm. 2025; 41(1):e13208.

PMID: 39817017 PMC: 11730721. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13208.


Outcomes of concurrent and delayed leadless pacemaker implantation following extraction of infected cardiovascular implantable electronic device.

Nadeem B, Sedrakyan S, Fatima A, Baig M, Ahmed A, Sherwani M J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39633137 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01960-2.


Feasibility, timing and outcome of leadless cardiac pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device extraction.

Kiblboeck D, Blessberger H, Ebner J, Boetscher J, Maier J, Reiter C Clin Res Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39133337 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02516-0.


Leadless Pacemaker Infection Risk in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Bertolino L, Florio L, Patauner F, Gallo R, Peluso A, Scafuri A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137641 PMC: 10743511. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247573.


[Leadless pacemakers : A "permanently" good solution?].

Steinwender C, Blessberger H, Saleh K Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2023; 34(4):272-277.

PMID: 37870606 PMC: 10682231. DOI: 10.1007/s00399-023-00970-3.