Maternal Vitamin D Status and the Relationship with Neonatal Anthropometric and Childhood Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: Results from the Seychelles Child Development Nutrition Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Vitamin D has an important role in early life; however, the optimal vitamin D status during pregnancy is currently unclear. There have been recent calls for pregnant women to maintain circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations >100 nmol/L for health, yet little is known about the long-term potential benefits or safety of achieving such high maternal 25(OH)D concentrations for infant or child health outcomes. We examined maternal vitamin D status and its associations with infant anthropometric and later childhood neurocognitive outcomes in a mother-child cohort in a sun-rich country near the equator (4.6° S). This study was conducted in pregnant mothers originally recruited to the Seychelles Child Development Nutrition Study. Blood samples ( = 202) taken at delivery were analysed for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations. Multiple linear regression models assessed associations between maternal 25(OH)D and birth weight, infant head circumference, and neurocognitive outcomes in the children at age 5 years. Mothers were, on average, 27 years of age, and the children's average gestational age was 39 weeks. None of the women reported any intake of vitamin D supplements. Maternal 25(OH)D concentrations had a mean of 101 (range 34-218 nmol/L) and none were deficient (<30 nmol/L). Maternal 25(OH)D concentrations were not associated with child anthropometric or neurodevelopmental outcomes. These findings appear to indicate that a higher vitamin D status is not a limiting factor for neonatal growth or neurocognitive development in the first 5 years of life. Larger studies with greater variability in vitamin D status are needed to further explore optimal cut-offs or non-linear associations (including for maternal health) that might exist among populations with sub-optimal exposure.
Melough M, Li M, Hamra G, Palmore M, Sauder K, Dunlop A J Nutr. 2023; 153(5):1502-1511.
PMID: 37147034 PMC: 10367223. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.03.005.
Cottrell J, Nelson C, Waldron C, Bergeron M, Samson A, Valentovic M Biomed Pharmacother. 2022; 158:114085.
PMID: 36508998 PMC: 9888605. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114085.
Impact of vitamin D on maternal and fetal health: A review.
Arshad R, Sameen A, Murtaza M, Sharif H, Iahtisham-Ul-Haq , Dawood S Food Sci Nutr. 2022; 10(10):3230-3240.
PMID: 36249984 PMC: 9548347. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2948.
Dimas A, Politi A, Bargiota A, Panoskaltsis T, Vlahos N, Valsamakis G Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(15).
PMID: 35955462 PMC: 9368754. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158328.
Challenges in estimating the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Africa - Authors' reply.
Mogire R, Atkinson S Lancet Glob Health. 2022; 10(4):e474.
PMID: 35303451 PMC: 7613543. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00040-7.