» Articles » PMID: 2913569

The Vista Paradox: a Natural Visual Illusion

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 1989 Jan 1
PMID 2913569
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Suppose an observer views a distant object through a window in the far wall of a room or corridor--a visual scene constituting a vista. If the observer moves toward the window, then the distant object will shrink in apparent size and appear farther away. These effects are paradoxical, because the distant object appears smaller as its visual angle increases. The vista paradox occurs under many other real-world conditions, such as viewing a distant object while moving out of the mouth of a valley, or driving across a topographic crest. In the present study, framing effects and the equidistance tendency are considered as possible factors. However, an explanation based on the dynamic relationship between the visual angle of the framing portion of a vista and the visual angle of a distant object appears more promising.

Citing Articles

The everchanging Sky-Tower - an apparent giant.

Schwarzkopf D, Kolf A, Lai C, Huang T, Kinoshita S Perception. 2023; 53(3):211-214.

PMID: 38130143 PMC: 10858621. DOI: 10.1177/03010066231222526.


The Dynamic Ebbinghaus: motion dynamics greatly enhance the classic contextual size illusion.

Mruczek R, Blair C, Strother L, Caplovitz G Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:77.

PMID: 25741271 PMC: 4332331. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00077.


Canonical visual size for real-world objects.

Konkle T, Oliva A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 37(1):23-37.

PMID: 20822298 PMC: 3408867. DOI: 10.1037/a0020413.


The vista paradox: is the effect partly explained by induced movement?.

Reinhardt-Rutland A Percept Psychophys. 1990; 47(1):95-6.

PMID: 2300431 DOI: 10.3758/bf03208171.


Quantitative determination of the three-dimensional appearances of a rotating ellipse without a rigidity assumption.

Beghi L, Xausa E, De Biasio C, Zanforlin M Biol Cybern. 1991; 65(6):433-40.

PMID: 1958729 DOI: 10.1007/BF00204656.

References
1.
FELLOWS B . The reverse Müller-Lyer illusion and "enclosure". Br J Psychol. 1968; 59(4):369-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1968.tb01151.x. View

2.
OVER R . Size- and distance-estimates of a single stimulus under different viewing conditions. Am J Psychol. 1963; 76:452-7. View

3.
KUNNAPAS T . Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line. J Exp Psychol. 1955; 50(3):168-70. View

4.
Baird J . The moon illusion: II. A reference theory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1982; 111(3):304-15. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.111.3.304. View

5.
WEINTRAUB D, Wilson B, GREENE R, Palmquist M . Delboeuf illusion: displacement versus diameter, arc deletions, and brightness contrast. J Exp Psychol. 1969; 80(3):505-11. DOI: 10.1037/h0027424. View