The Vista Paradox: is the Effect Partly Explained by Induced Movement?

Overview

Journal Percept Psychophys

Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 1990 Jan 1

PMID 2300431

Citations 1

Authors

A H Reinhardt-Rutland

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

The Dynamic Ebbinghaus: motion dynamics greatly enhance the classic contextual size illusion.

Mruczek R, Blair C, Strother L, Caplovitz G Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; 9:77.

PMID: 25741271 PMC: 4332331. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00077.

References

Reinhardt-Rutland A . Induced movement in the visual modality: an overview. Psychol Bull. 1988; 103(1):57-71. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.57. View

FARNE M . Induced motion in three dimensions. Percept Mot Skills. 1970; 30(2):426. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1970.30.2.426. View

GOGEL W, Griffin B . Spatial induction of illusory motion. Perception. 1982; 11(2):187-99. DOI: 10.1068/p110187. View

Reinhardt-Rutland A . Peripheral movement, induced movement, and aftereffects from induced movement. Perception. 1981; 10(2):173-82. DOI: 10.1068/p100173. View

Walker J, Rupich R, Powell J . The vista paradox: a natural visual illusion. Percept Psychophys. 1989; 45(1):43-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03208031. View

Brigell M, Uhlarik J, Goldhorn P . Contextual influences on judgments of linear extent. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1977; 3(1):105-18. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.3.1.105. View

GOGEL W . Induced motion as a function of the speed of the inducing object, measured by means of two methods. Perception. 1979; 8(3):255-62. DOI: 10.1068/p080255. View

Reinhardt-Rutland A . Aftereffect of induced rotation: number of radial lines in inducing stimulus. Percept Mot Skills. 1983; 57(1):39-42. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1983.57.1.39. View

Reinhardt-Rutland A . Induced movement-in-depth: relative location of static stimulus and direction asymmetry. Percept Mot Skills. 1983; 57(1):255-8. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1983.57.1.255. View

10.

GOGEL W . SIZE CUES AND THE ADJACENCY PRINCIPLE. J Exp Psychol. 1965; 70:289-93. DOI: 10.1037/h0022211. View

11.

FARNE M . Motion in depth induced by brightness changes in the background. Perception. 1977; 6(3):295-7. DOI: 10.1068/p060295. View

12.

Day R . Induced rotation with concentric patterns. Percept Psychophys. 1981; 29(5):493-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03207363. View

13.

GOGEL W . EQUIDISTANCE TENDENCY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. Psychol Bull. 1965; 64:153-63. DOI: 10.1037/h0022197. View

14.

Reinhardt-Rutland A . Negative aftereffect arising from prolonged viewing of induced movement-in-depth. Percept Mot Skills. 1984; 58(2):359-62. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1984.58.2.359. View

15.

WEINTRAUB D, Schneck M . Fragments of Delboeuf and Ebbinghaus illusions: contour/context explorations of misjudged circle size. Percept Psychophys. 1986; 40(3):147-58. DOI: 10.3758/bf03203010. View

16.

Becklen R, WALLACH H . How does speed change affect induced motion?. Percept Psychophys. 1985; 37(3):231-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03207569. View

17.

FARNE M . Studies on induced motion in the third dimension. Perception. 1972; 1(3):351-7. DOI: 10.1068/p010351. View