» Articles » PMID: 29121942

Ethical Aspects of Brain Computer Interfaces: a Scoping Review

Overview
Journal BMC Med Ethics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2017 Nov 11
PMID 29121942
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a set of technologies that are of increasing interest to researchers. BCI has been proposed as assistive technology for individuals who are non-communicative or paralyzed, such as those with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or spinal cord injury. The technology has also been suggested for enhancement and entertainment uses, and there are companies currently marketing BCI devices for those purposes (e.g., gaming) as well as health-related purposes (e.g., communication). The unprecedented direct connection created by BCI between human brains and computer hardware raises various ethical, social, and legal challenges that merit further examination and discussion.

Methods: To identify and characterize the key issues associated with BCI use, we performed a scoping review of biomedical ethics literature, analyzing the ethics concerns cited across multiple disciplines, including philosophy and medicine.

Results: Based on this investigation, we report that BCI research and its potential translation to therapeutic intervention generate significant ethical, legal, and social concerns, notably with regards to personhood, stigma, autonomy, privacy, research ethics, safety, responsibility, and justice. Our review of the literature determined, furthermore, that while these issues have been enumerated extensively, few concrete recommendations have been expressed.

Conclusions: We conclude that future research should focus on remedying a lack of practical solutions to the ethical challenges of BCI, alongside the collection of empirical data on the perspectives of the public, BCI users, and BCI researchers.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Impact of Brain-Computer Interfaces on Health Care: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Prospects: A Review Article.

Sah S, Taksande V, Jadhav D, Maurya A J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025; 16(Suppl 4):S3037-S3040.

PMID: 39926788 PMC: 11805155. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1005_24.


Community perspectives regarding brain-computer interfaces: A cross-sectional study of community-dwelling adults in the UK.

El-Osta A, Al Ammouri M, Khan S, Altalib S, Karki M, Riboli-Sasco E PLOS Digit Health. 2025; 4(2):e0000524.

PMID: 39908280 PMC: 11798465. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000524.


Brain computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement in older people - challenges and applications: a systematic review.

Tsai P, Akpan A, Tang K, Lakany H BMC Geriatr. 2025; 25(1):36.

PMID: 39819299 PMC: 11737249. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-025-05676-4.


Media Representation of the Ethical Issues Pertaining to Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Technology.

Beck S, Liberman Y, Dubljevic V Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766454 PMC: 11674794. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121255.


A review of ethical considerations for the medical applications of brain-computer interfaces.

Zhang Z, Chen Y, Zhao X, Fan W, Peng D, Li T Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(6):3603-3614.

PMID: 39712096 PMC: 11655950. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10144-7.


References
1.
Farah M . Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(1):34-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001. View

2.
Zehr E . The potential transformation of our species by neural enhancement. J Mot Behav. 2015; 47(1):73-8. PMC: 4299867. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2014.916652. View

3.
Glannon W . Neuromodulation, agency and autonomy. Brain Topogr. 2013; 27(1):46-54. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-012-0269-3. View

4.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, OBrien K . Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:69. PMC: 2954944. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. View

5.
Kotchetkov I, Hwang B, Appelboom G, Kellner C, Connolly Jr E . Brain-computer interfaces: military, neurosurgical, and ethical perspective. Neurosurg Focus. 2010; 28(5):E25. DOI: 10.3171/2010.2.FOCUS1027. View