BCI Meeting 2005--workshop on Signals and Recording Methods
Overview
Rehabilitation Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
This paper describes the highlights of presentations and discussions during the Third International BCI Meeting in a workshop that evaluated potential brain-computer interface (BCI) signals and currently available recording methods. It defined the main potential user populations and their needs, addressed the relative advantages and disadvantages of noninvasive and implanted (i.e., invasive) methodologies, considered ethical issues, and focused on the challenges involved in translating BCI systems from the laboratory to widespread clinical use. The workshop stressed the critical importance of developing useful applications that establish the practical value of BCI technology.
Guo M, Yang B, Geng Y, Jie R, Zhang Y, Zheng Y Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2024; 41(4):684-691.
PMID: 39218593 PMC: 11366478. DOI: 10.7507/1001-5515.202403041.
Wang Y, Yang Z, Ji H, Li J, Liu L, Zhuang J Front Psychol. 2022; 13:833007.
PMID: 35465540 PMC: 9021696. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833007.
Palumbo A, Ielpo N, Calabrese B Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(1).
PMID: 35009860 PMC: 8749705. DOI: 10.3390/s22010318.
Rashid M, Sulaiman N, P P Abdul Majeed A, Musa R, Ab Nasir A, Bari B Front Neurorobot. 2020; 14:25.
PMID: 32581758 PMC: 7283463. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00025.
Clinician awareness of brain computer interfaces: a Canadian national survey.
Letourneau S, Zewdie E, Jadavji Z, Andersen J, Burkholder L, Kirton A J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):2.
PMID: 31907010 PMC: 6945584. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0624-7.