» Articles » PMID: 29117521

Sparse Labeling PELDOR Spectroscopy on Multimeric Mechanosensitive Membrane Channels

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2017 Nov 9
PMID 29117521
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pulse electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is being applied to ever more complex biological systems comprising multiple subunits. Membrane channel proteins are of great interest as pulse EPR reports on functionally significant but distinct conformational states in a native environment without the need for crystallization. Pulse EPR, in the form of pulsed electron-electron double resonance (PELDOR), using site-directed spin labeling, is most commonly employed to accurately determine distances (in the nanometer range) between different regions of the structure. However, PELDOR data analysis is more challenging in systems containing more than two spins (e.g., homomultimers) due to distorting multispin effects. Without suppression of these effects, much of the information contained in PELDOR data cannot be reliably retrieved. Thus, it is of utmost importance for future PELDOR applications in structural biology to develop suitable approaches that can overcome the multispin problem. Here, two different approaches for suppressing multispin effects in PELDOR, sparse labeling of the protein (reducing the labeling efficiency f) and reducing the excitation probability of spins (λ), are compared on two distinct bacterial mechanosensitive channels. For both the pentameric channel of large conductance (MscL) and the heptameric channel of small conductance (MscS) of Escherichia coli, mutants containing a spin label in the cytosolic or the transmembrane region were tested. Data demonstrate that distance distributions can be significantly improved with either approach compared to the standard PELDOR measurement, and confirm that λ < 1/(n-1) is needed to sufficiently suppress multispin effects (with n being the number of spins in the system). A clear advantage of the sparse labeling approach is demonstrated for the cytosolic mutants due to a significantly smaller loss in sensitivity. For the transmembrane mutants, this advantage is less pronounced but still useful for MscS, but performance is inferior for MscL possibly due to structural perturbations by the bulkier diamagnetic spin label analog.

Citing Articles

Pulsed EPR Methods in the Angstrom to Nanometre Scale Shed Light on the Conformational Flexibility of a Fluoride Riboswitch.

Remmel L, Meyer A, Ackermann K, Hagelueken G, Bennati M, Bode B Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2024; 63(49):e202411241.

PMID: 39225197 PMC: 11586693. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202411241.


CRISPR antiphage defence mediated by the cyclic nucleotide-binding membrane protein Csx23.

Gruschow S, McQuarrie S, Ackermann K, McMahon S, Bode B, Gloster T Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(6):2761-2775.

PMID: 38471818 PMC: 11014256. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae167.


Strategies to identify and suppress crosstalk signals in double electron-electron resonance (DEER) experiments with gadolinium and nitroxide spin-labeled compounds.

Teucher M, Qi M, Cati N, Hintz H, Godt A, Bordignon E Magn Reson (Gott). 2023; 1(2):285-299.

PMID: 37904822 PMC: 10500692. DOI: 10.5194/mr-1-285-2020.


Activation of Csm6 ribonuclease by cyclic nucleotide binding: in an emergency, twist to open.

McQuarrie S, Athukoralage J, McMahon S, Graham S, Ackermann K, Bode B Nucleic Acids Res. 2023; 51(19):10590-10605.

PMID: 37747760 PMC: 10702470. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad739.


Approaches for the modulation of mechanosensitive MscL channel pores.

Lane B, Pliotas C Front Chem. 2023; 11:1162412.

PMID: 37021145 PMC: 10069478. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1162412.


References
1.
Chiang Y, Borbat P, Freed J . The determination of pair distance distributions by pulsed ESR using Tikhonov regularization. J Magn Reson. 2005; 172(2):279-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.10.012. View

2.
Sukharev S, Sigurdson W, Kung C, Sachs F . Energetic and spatial parameters for gating of the bacterial large conductance mechanosensitive channel, MscL. J Gen Physiol. 1999; 113(4):525-40. PMC: 2217166. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.113.4.525. View

3.
Branigan E, Pliotas C, Hagelueken G, Naismith J . Quantification of free cysteines in membrane and soluble proteins using a fluorescent dye and thermal unfolding. Nat Protoc. 2013; 8(11):2090-7. PMC: 3836627. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2013.128. View

4.
Jeschke G, Wegener C, Nietschke M, Jung H, Steinhoff H . Interresidual distance determination by four-pulse double electron-electron resonance in an integral membrane protein: the Na+/proline transporter PutP of Escherichia coli. Biophys J. 2004; 86(4):2551-7. PMC: 1304102. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74310-6. View

5.
Kazmier K, Sharma S, Islam S, Roux B, Mchaourab H . Conformational cycle and ion-coupling mechanism of the Na+/hydantoin transporter Mhp1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(41):14752-7. PMC: 4205665. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1410431111. View