» Articles » PMID: 29115934

Population Structure and Genomic Inbreeding in Nine Swiss Dairy Cattle Populations

Overview
Journal Genet Sel Evol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2017 Nov 9
PMID 29115934
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Domestication, breed formation and intensive selection have resulted in divergent cattle breeds that likely exhibit their own genomic signatures. In this study, we used genotypes from 27,612 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms to characterize population structure based on 9214 sires representing nine Swiss dairy cattle populations: Brown Swiss (BS), Braunvieh (BV), Original Braunvieh (OB), Holstein (HO), Red Holstein (RH), Swiss Fleckvieh (SF), Simmental (SI), Eringer (ER) and Evolèner (EV). Genomic inbreeding (F ) and signatures of selection were determined by calculating runs of homozygosity (ROH). The results build the basis for a better understanding of the genetic development of Swiss dairy cattle populations and highlight differences between the original populations (i.e. OB, SI, ER and EV) and those that have become more popular in Switzerland as currently reflected by their larger populations (i.e. BS, BV, HO, RH and SF).

Results: The levels of genetic diversity were highest and lowest in the SF and BS breeds, respectively. Based on F values, we conclude that, among all pairwise comparisons, BS and HO (0.156) differ more than the other pairs of populations. The original Swiss cattle populations OB, SI, ER, and EV are clearly genetically separated from the Swiss cattle populations that are now more common and represented by larger numbers of cows. Mean levels of F ranged from 0.027 (ER) to 0.091 (BS). Three of the original Swiss cattle populations, ER (F : 0.027), OB (F : 0.029), and SI (F : 0.039), showed low levels of genomic inbreeding, whereas it was much higher in EV (F : 0.074). Private signatures of selection for the original Swiss cattle populations are reported for BTA4, 5, 11 and 26.

Conclusions: The low levels of genomic inbreeding observed in the original Swiss cattle populations ER, OB and SI compared to the other breeds are explained by a lesser use of artificial insemination and greater use of natural service. Natural service results in more sires having progeny at each generation and thus this breeding practice is likely the major reason for the remarkable levels of genetic diversity retained within these populations. The fact that the EV population is regionally restricted and its small census size of herd-book cows explain its high level of genomic inbreeding.

Citing Articles

Assessment of genome complementarity in three beef-on-dairy crossbreds reveals sire-specific effects on production traits with comparable rates of genomic inbreeding reduction.

Lindtke D, Lerch S, Morel I, Neuditschko M BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):1118.

PMID: 39567870 PMC: 11577664. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-11029-z.


Genetic Diversity and Selection Signatures of Lvliang Black Goat Using Genome-Wide SNP Data.

Cai K, Wang W, Wang X, Pang Z, Zhou Z, Cheng L Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(21).

PMID: 39518877 PMC: 11544794. DOI: 10.3390/ani14213154.


Analyzing Runs of Homozygosity Reveals Patterns of Selection in German Brown Cattle.

Wirth A, Duda J, Emmerling R, Gotz K, Birkenmaier F, Distl O Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39202411 PMC: 11354284. DOI: 10.3390/genes15081051.


Definition of metafounders based on population structure analysis.

Anglhuber C, Edel C, Pimentel E, Emmerling R, Gotz K, Thaller G Genet Sel Evol. 2024; 56(1):43.

PMID: 38844876 PMC: 11536677. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00913-7.


Genetic Variation and Composition of Two Commercial Estonian Dairy Cattle Breeds Assessed by SNP Data.

Varv S, Polluaar T, Sild E, Viinalass H, Kaart T Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38612340 PMC: 11010984. DOI: 10.3390/ani14071101.


References
1.
de Simoni Gouveia J, Silva M, Paiva S, de Oliveira S . Identification of selection signatures in livestock species. Genet Mol Biol. 2014; 37(2):330-42. PMC: 4094609. DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572014000300004. View

2.
Nilsen H, Olsen H, Hayes B, Nome T, Sehested E, Svendsen M . Characterization of a QTL region affecting clinical mastitis and protein yield on BTA6. Anim Genet. 2009; 40(5):701-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01908.x. View

3.
Akey J, Ruhe A, Akey D, Wong A, Connelly C, Madeoy J . Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(3):1160-5. PMC: 2824266. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909918107. View

4.
Sonesson A, Woolliams J, Meuwissen T . Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding. Genet Sel Evol. 2012; 44:27. PMC: 3522025. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-27. View

5.
Kardos M, Luikart G, Allendorf F . Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees. Heredity (Edinb). 2015; 115(1):63-72. PMC: 4815495. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2015.17. View