» Articles » PMID: 19393047

Genome Wide Signatures of Positive Selection: the Comparison of Independent Samples and the Identification of Regions Associated to Traits

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2009 Apr 28
PMID 19393047
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The goal of genome wide analyses of polymorphisms is to achieve a better understanding of the link between genotype and phenotype. Part of that goal is to understand the selective forces that have operated on a population.

Results: In this study we compared the signals of selection, identified through population divergence in the Bovine HapMap project, to those found in an independent sample of cattle from Australia. Evidence for population differentiation across the genome, as measured by FST, was highly correlated in the two data sets. Nevertheless, 40% of the variance in FST between the two studies was attributed to the differences in breed composition. Seventy six percent of the variance in FST was attributed to differences in SNP composition and density when the same breeds were compared. The difference between FST of adjacent loci increased rapidly with the increase in distance between SNP, reaching an asymptote after 20 kb. Using 129 SNP that have highly divergent FST values in both data sets, we identified 12 regions that had additive effects on the traits residual feed intake, beef yield or intramuscular fatness measured in the Australian sample. Four of these regions had effects on more than one trait. One of these regions includes the R3HDM1 gene, which is under selection in European humans.

Conclusion: Firstly, many different populations will be necessary for a full description of selective signatures across the genome, not just a small set of highly divergent populations. Secondly, it is necessary to use the same SNP when comparing the signatures of selection from one study to another. Thirdly, useful signatures of selection can be obtained where many of the groups have only minor genetic differences and may not be clearly separated in a principal component analysis. Fourthly, combining analyses of genome wide selection signatures and genome wide associations to traits helps to define the trait under selection or the population group in which the QTL is likely to be segregating. Finally, the FST difference between adjacent loci suggests that 150,000 evenly spaced SNP will be required to study selective signatures in all parts of the bovine genome.

Citing Articles

Comparative Analysis of Runs of Homozygosity Islands in Indigenous and Commercial Chickens Revealed Candidate Loci for Disease Resistance and Production Traits.

Rostamzadeh Mahdabi E, Esmailizadeh A, Han J, Wang M Vet Med Sci. 2024; 11(1):e70074.

PMID: 39655377 PMC: 11629026. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.70074.


Genome-wide mapping of quantitative trait loci conferring resistance to stripe rust in spring wheat line PI 660072.

Zhou X, Wang Y, Luo Y, Shuai J, Jia G, Chen H Theor Appl Genet. 2024; 137(11):255.

PMID: 39443304 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04760-4.


High-Density Genomic Characterization of Native Croatian Sheep Breeds.

Drzaic I, Curik I, Lukic B, Shihabi M, Li M, Kantanen J Front Genet. 2022; 13:940736.

PMID: 35910220 PMC: 9337876. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.940736.


Hitchhiking Mapping of Candidate Regions Associated with Fat Deposition in Iranian Thin and Fat Tail Sheep Breeds Suggests New Insights into Molecular Aspects of Fat Tail Selection.

Moradi M, Nejati-Javaremi A, Moradi-Shahrbabak M, Dodds K, Brauning R, McEwan J Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 35681887 PMC: 9179914. DOI: 10.3390/ani12111423.


Long-term artificial selection of Hanwoo (Korean) cattle left genetic signatures for the breeding traits and has altered the genomic structure.

Seo D, Lee D, Jin S, Won J, Lim D, Park M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):6438.

PMID: 35440706 PMC: 9018707. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09425-0.


References
1.
Hawken R, Barris W, McWilliam S, Dalrymple B . An interactive bovine in silico SNP database (IBISS). Mamm Genome. 2004; 15(10):819-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00335-004-2382-4. View

2.
Gibbs R, Taylor J, Van Tassell C, Barendse W, Eversole K, Gill C . Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds. Science. 2009; 324(5926):528-32. PMC: 2735092. DOI: 10.1126/science.1167936. View

3.
Nielsen R, Williamson S, Kim Y, Hubisz M, Clark A, Bustamante C . Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Res. 2005; 15(11):1566-75. PMC: 1310644. DOI: 10.1101/gr.4252305. View

4.
Ozaki K, Ohnishi Y, Iida A, Sekine A, Yamada R, Tsunoda T . Functional SNPs in the lymphotoxin-alpha gene that are associated with susceptibility to myocardial infarction. Nat Genet. 2002; 32(4):650-4. DOI: 10.1038/ng1047. View

5.
Hardenbol P, Yu F, Belmont J, MacKenzie J, Bruckner C, Brundage T . Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay. Genome Res. 2005; 15(2):269-75. PMC: 546528. DOI: 10.1101/gr.3185605. View