» Articles » PMID: 29114628

Femoral Tunnel Positioning in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anteromedial Portal Versus Transtibial Technique-A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Joints
Publisher Thieme
Date 2017 Nov 9
PMID 29114628
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 The purpose of this study was to investigate, through three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT), the accuracy of femoral tunnel positioning in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing transtibial (TT) and anteromedial (AM) techniques.  We evaluated postoperative 3D-CT scans of 26 patients treated with ACL reconstruction with hamstrings autograft using a low accessory AM portal technique and 26 treated with the TT technique. The position of the femoral tunnel center was measured with the quadrant method.  Using quadrant method on CT scans, femoral tunnels were measured at a mean of 32.2 and 28.1% from the proximal condylar surface (parallel to Blumensaat line) and at a mean of 31.2 and 15.1% from the notch roof (perpendicular to Blumensaat line) for the AM and TT techniques, respectively.  The AM portal technique provides more anatomical graft placement than TT techniques.  Level I, randomized clinical study.

Citing Articles

Six Percent Incidence of Graft-Tunnel Mismatch in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patella Tendon-Bone Autograft and Anteromedial Portal Drilling.

Dwyer T, Hoit G, Sellan M, Gopinath R, Whelan D, Theodoropoulos J Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022; 4(2):e479-e486.

PMID: 35494272 PMC: 9042781. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.11.006.


Transtibial versus independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of femoral aperture positioning.

Haroun H, Abouelsoud M, Allam M, Abdelwahab M J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1):166.

PMID: 35303903 PMC: 8931956. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03040-5.


A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Standard Techniques Are Comparable (299 Trials With 25,816 Patients).

Matar H, Platt S, Bloch B, James P, Cameron H Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021; 3(4):e1211-e1226.

PMID: 34430902 PMC: 8365213. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.03.017.


Independent Versus Transtibial Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression.

Cuzzolin M, Previtali D, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, Candrian C, Grassi A Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(7):23259671211015616.

PMID: 34291116 PMC: 8278479. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211015616.


Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Anteromedial Portal Versus Transtibial Technique in ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Loucas M, Loucas R, DAmbrosi R, Hantes M Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(7):23259671211024591.

PMID: 34277881 PMC: 8255613. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211024591.


References
1.
Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski R, McMahon P . Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(5):712-8. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504271747. View

2.
Meuffels D, Potters J, Koning A, Brown Jr C, Verhaar J, Reijman M . Visualization of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction bone tunnels: reliability of standard radiographs, CT scans, and 3D virtual reality images. Acta Orthop. 2011; 82(6):699-703. PMC: 3247888. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.623566. View

3.
Loh J, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman R, Fu F, Woo S . Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(3):297-304. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2003.50084. View

4.
Kato Y, Maeyama A, Lertwanich P, Wang J, Ingham S, Kramer S . Biomechanical comparison of different graft positions for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 21(4):816-23. PMC: 3604595. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1951-4. View

5.
Chambat P, Guier C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Fayard J, Thaunat M . The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(2):181-6. PMC: 3560904. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1759-3. View