» Articles » PMID: 24605187

In Vivo Three-dimensional Imaging Analysis of Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Locations in Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Mar 8
PMID 24605187
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Anatomic footprint restoration of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is recommended during reconstruction surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the femoral and tibial tunnel positions of transtibial single bundle (SB) and transportal double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT).

Methods: In this study, 26 patients who underwent transtibial SB ACL reconstruction and 27 patients with transportal DB ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. 3D-CTs were taken within 1 week after the operation. The obtained digital images were then imported into the commercial package Geomagic Studio v10.0. The femoral tunnel positions were evaluated using the quadrant method. The mean, standard deviation, standard error, minimum, maximum, and 95% confidence interval values were determined for each measurement.

Results: The femoral tunnel for the SB technique was located 35.07% ± 5.33% in depth and 16.62% ± 4.99% in height. The anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnel of DB technique was located 30.48% ± 5.02% in depth, 17.12% ± 5.84% in height and 34.76% ± 5.87% in depth, 45.55% ± 6.88% in height, respectively. The tibial tunnel with the SB technique was located 45.43% ± 4.81% from the anterior margin and 47.62% ± 2.51% from the medial tibial articular margin. The AM and PL tunnel of the DB technique was located 33.76% ± 7.83% from the anterior margin, 45.56% ± 2.71% from the medial tibial articular margin and 53.19% ± 3.74% from the anterior margin, 46.00% ± 2.48% from the medial tibial articular margin, respectively. The tibial tunnel position with the transtibial SB technique was located between the AM and PL tunnel positions formed with the transportal DB technique.

Conclusions: Using the 3D-CT measuring method, the location of the tibia tunnel was between the AM and PL footprints, but the center of the femoral tunnel was at more shallow position from the AM bundle footprint when ACL reconstruction was performed by the transtibial SB technique.

Citing Articles

Ideal Combination of Anatomic Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Positions for Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction.

Yoon K, Kim Y, Park J, Kim S, Lee J, Choi S Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(1):23259671211069960.

PMID: 35071661 PMC: 8777344. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211069960.


3D CT evaluation of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Tank S, Dutt S, Sehrawat R, Kumar V, Sabat D J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 15:22-26.

PMID: 33680823 PMC: 7919926. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.11.004.


Imaging the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments.

Parkar A J Belg Soc Radiol. 2018; 100(1):98.

PMID: 30151491 PMC: 6100662. DOI: 10.5334/jbr-btr.1197.


[Histological properties of autogenous hamstring grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Wu B, Qiu Z, Li S, Liang D, Xu J, Zhong M Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018; 32(7):873-879.

PMID: 30129311 PMC: 8435969. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201802001.


How to evaluate bone tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction - a critical review.

de Beus A, Koch J, Hirschmann A, Hirschmann M Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017; 7(2):230-239.

PMID: 29264333 PMC: 5725171. DOI: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.2.230.


References
1.
Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski R, McMahon P . Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(5):712-8. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504271747. View

2.
Aglietti P, Zaccherotti G, Menchetti P, De Biase P . A comparison of clinical and radiological parameters with two arthroscopic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995; 3(1):2-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF01553517. View

3.
Amis A, Beynnon B, Blankevoort L, Chambat P, Christel P, Durselen L . Proceedings of the ESSKA Scientific Workshop on Reconstruction of the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994; 2(3):124-32. DOI: 10.1007/BF01467913. View

4.
Ho J, Gardiner A, Shah V, Steiner M . Equal kinematics between central anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(5):464-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.013. View

5.
Zantop T, Diermann N, Schumacher T, Schanz S, Fu F, Petersen W . Anatomical and nonanatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: importance of femoral tunnel location on knee kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36(4):678-85. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508314414. View