» Articles » PMID: 29074962

Epigenetics and Adaptive Phenotypic Variation Between Habitats in an Asexual Snail

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Oct 28
PMID 29074962
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In neo-Darwinian theory, adaptation results from a response to selection on relatively slowly accumulating genetic variation. However, more rapid adaptive responses are possible if selectable or plastic phenotypic variation is produced by epigenetic differences in gene expression. This rapid path to adaptation may prove particularly important when genetic variation is lacking, such as in small, bottlenecked, or asexual populations. To examine the potential for an epigenetic contribution to adaptive variation, we examined morphological divergence and epigenetic variation in genetically impoverished asexual populations of a freshwater snail, Potamopyrgus antipodarum, from distinct habitats (two lakes versus two rivers). These populations exhibit habitat specific differences in shell shape, and these differences are consistent with adaptation to water current speed. Between these same habitats, we also found significant genome wide DNA methylation differences. The differences between habitats were an order of magnitude greater than the differences between replicate sites of the same habitat. These observations suggest one possible mechanism for the expression of adaptive shell shape differences between habitats involves environmentally induced epigenetic differences. This provides a potential explanation for the capacity of this asexual snail to spread by adaptive evolution or plasticity to different environments.

Citing Articles

Climate resilience in goats: a comprehensive review of the genetic basis for adaptation to varied climatic conditions.

Parsad R, Ahlawat S, Bagiyal M, Arora R, Gera R, Chhabra P Mamm Genome. 2024; 36(1):151-161.

PMID: 39738581 DOI: 10.1007/s00335-024-10101-z.


Mission SpaceX CRS-19 RRRM-1 space flight induced skin genomic plasticity via an epigenetic trigger.

Singh K, Verma P, Srivastava R, Rustagi Y, Kumar M, Verma S iScience. 2024; 27(12):111382.

PMID: 39687026 PMC: 11647166. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111382.


Generational stability of epigenetic transgenerational inheritance facilitates adaptation and evolution.

Korolenko A, Skinner M Epigenetics. 2024; 19(1):2380929.

PMID: 39104183 PMC: 11305060. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2024.2380929.


Emergence of phenotypic plasticity through epigenetic mechanisms.

Romero-Mujalli D, Fuchs L, Haase M, Hildebrandt J, Weissing F, Revilla T Evol Lett. 2024; 8(4):561-574.

PMID: 39100234 PMC: 11291936. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrae012.


The evolutionary consequences of interactions between the epigenome, the genome and the environment.

Baduel P, Sammarco I, Barrett R, Coronado-Zamora M, Crespel A, Diez-Rodriguez B Evol Appl. 2024; 17(7):e13730.

PMID: 39050763 PMC: 11266121. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13730.


References
1.
Huang D, Sherman B, Lempicki R . Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4(1):44-57. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. View

2.
Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M . Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 42(Database issue):D199-205. PMC: 3965122. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1076. View

3.
Klironomos F, Berg J, Collins S . How epigenetic mutations can affect genetic evolution: model and mechanism. Bioessays. 2013; 35(6):571-8. DOI: 10.1002/bies.201200169. View

4.
Furrow R . Epigenetic inheritance, epimutation, and the response to selection. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e101559. PMC: 4096402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101559. View

5.
Cortijo S, Wardenaar R, Colome-Tatche M, Gilly A, Etcheverry M, Labadie K . Mapping the epigenetic basis of complex traits. Science. 2014; 343(6175):1145-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1248127. View