» Articles » PMID: 29073186

Ethical Issues in the Development and Implementation of Nutrition-related Public Health Policies and Interventions: A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Oct 27
PMID 29073186
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The limited integration of ethics in nutrition-related public health policies and interventions is one major concern for those who have the task of implementing them. Ethical challenges that are overlooked during the development of such interventions could raise serious ethical issues during their implementation and even after. As a result, these decision makers need technical support and ethical guidance for adaptation of interventions to local (cultural, social, economic, etc.) contexts.

Aim: The goal of this scoping review is to delineate and "map" the range of ethical issues in nutrition-related public health interventions, as well as the range of the various fields in which they may arise.

Methods: A scoping review of empirical research and conceptual literature was conducted following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. Searches using PubMed with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) categories and Advanced Search Builder as well as in the Global Health Library were performed. The final sample consists of 169 publications.

Results: The ethics of public health prevention or treatment of obesity and non-communicable diseases is the most explicitly and frequently discussed subject. In comparison, ethical issues raised by public health interventions in the fields of undernutrition, breastfeeding, vitamin/mineral supplementation and food fortification, food security, food sustainability and food safety are addressed in a lower proportion of the sample. The results illustrate the various natures, types, and scopes of existing public health nutrition-related interventions, and the various ethical issues that may be raised by these interventions, in addition to the numerous and different contexts in which they may be implemented.

Discussion: The ethical issues faced in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health interventions are varied and cannot be equated with, nor generalized about, when dealing with specific activities in this field. More importantly, these ethical issues cannot be managed without a careful consideration for the complexity of contexts in which nutrition-related interventions are expected to be implemented. These interventions engage a variety of actors with diverse perspectives and interests. We discuss these challenges and also comment on the importance of considering ethical impacts in the monitoring and evaluation of such interventions.

Conclusion: General ethical frameworks or recommendations-although useful-cannot be expected to provide policy makers, implementators and other public health personnel with sufficient practical ethical guidance as they cannot consider and anticipate the particularities of all specific nutrition-related public health interventions and the complexity of the contexts in which they are implemented. Further research is needed in order to develop more targeted ethical frameworks.

Citing Articles

Ethical Issues and Challenges Regarding the Use of Mental Health Questionnaires in Public Health Nutrition Research.

Khaled K, Tsofliou F, Hundley V Nutrients. 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40005043 PMC: 11858303. DOI: 10.3390/nu17040715.


Ethical Issues in Breastfeeding and Lactation Interventions: A Scoping Review.

Subramani S, Vinay R, Marz J, Hefti M, Biller-Andorno N J Hum Lact. 2023; 40(1):150-163.

PMID: 38087449 PMC: 10799543. DOI: 10.1177/08903344231215073.


Understanding the role of the state in dietary public health policymaking: a critical scoping review.

Karreman N, Huang Y, Egan N, Carters-White L, Hawkins B, Adams J Health Promot Int. 2023; 38(5).

PMID: 37665718 PMC: 10476878. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daad100.


Perspectives of agriculture, nutrition and health researchers regarding research governance in Malawi. Using a leadership, ethics, governance and systems framework.

Matandika L, Millar K, Umar E, Mfutso-Bengo J BMC Med Ethics. 2023; 24(1):66.

PMID: 37605143 PMC: 10441702. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00940-x.


Public perceptions of responsibility for recommended food policies in seven countries.

Pinho-Gomes A, Booth L, Pettigrew S Eur J Public Health. 2023; 33(2):299-304.

PMID: 36763587 PMC: 10066496. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad020.


References
1.
Weale A . Ethical arguments relevant to the use of GM crops. N Biotechnol. 2010; 27(5):582-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.08.013. View

2.
Freedhoff Y . The food industry is neither friend, nor foe, nor partner. Obes Rev. 2013; 15(1):6-8. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12128. View

3.
Labonte R . Health in All (Foreign) Policy: challenges in achieving coherence. Health Promot Int. 2014; 29 Suppl 1:i48-58. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dau031. View

4.
Christian M, Devereaux A, Dichter J, Rubinson L, Kissoon N . Introduction and executive summary: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest. 2014; 146(4 Suppl):8S-34S. PMC: 7094437. DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-0732. View

5.
Morin K . Knowledge and attitudes of Canadian consumers and health care professionals regarding nutritional genomics. OMICS. 2009; 13(1):37-41. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2008.0047. View