» Articles » PMID: 29066947

Biomarkers and Stimulation Algorithms for Adaptive Brain Stimulation

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2017 Oct 26
PMID 29066947
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The goal of this review is to describe in what ways feedback or adaptive stimulation may be delivered and adjusted based on relevant biomarkers. Specific treatment mechanisms underlying therapeutic brain stimulation remain unclear, in spite of the demonstrated efficacy in a number of nervous system diseases. Brain stimulation appears to exert widespread influence over specific neural networks that are relevant to specific disease entities. In awake patients, activation or suppression of these neural networks can be assessed by either symptom alleviation (i.e., tremor, rigidity, seizures) or physiological criteria, which may be predictive of expected symptomatic treatment. Secondary verification of network activation through specific biomarkers that are linked to symptomatic disease improvement may be useful for several reasons. For example, these biomarkers could aid optimal intraoperative localization, possibly improve efficacy or efficiency (i.e., reduced power needs), and provide long-term adaptive automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters. Possible biomarkers for use in portable or implanted devices span from ongoing physiological brain activity, evoked local field potentials (LFPs), and intermittent pathological activity, to wearable devices, biochemical, blood flow, optical, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes, temperature changes, or optogenetic signals. First, however, potential biomarkers must be correlated directly with symptom or disease treatment and network activation. Although numerous biomarkers are under consideration for a variety of stimulation indications the feasibility of these approaches has yet to be fully determined. Particularly, there are critical questions whether the use of adaptive systems can improve efficacy over continuous stimulation, facilitate adjustment of stimulation interventions and improve our understanding of the role of abnormal network function in disease mechanisms.

Citing Articles

The Neurostimulationist will see you now: prescribing direct electrical stimulation therapies for the human brain in epilepsy and beyond.

Hadar P, Zelmann R, Salami P, Cash S, Paulk A Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1439541.

PMID: 39296917 PMC: 11408201. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1439541.


Development and Evaluation of a Real-Time Phase-Triggered Stimulation Algorithm for the CorTec Brain Interchange.

Cho H, Benjaber M, Alexis Gkogkidis C, Buchheit M, Ruiz-Rodriguez J, Grannan B IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024; 32:3625-3635.

PMID: 39264785 PMC: 11485249. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3459801.


At home adaptive dual target deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease with proportional control.

Schmidt S, Chowdhury A, Mitchell K, Peters J, Gao Q, Lee H Brain. 2023; 147(3):911-922.

PMID: 38128546 PMC: 10907084. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad429.


Multimodal subspace identification for modeling discrete-continuous spiking and field potential population activity.

Ahmadipour P, Sani O, Pesaran B, Shanechi M J Neural Eng. 2023; 21(2).

PMID: 38016450 PMC: 10913727. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad1053.


Temporally non-regular patterns of deep brain stimulation (DBS) enhance assessment of evoked potentials while maintaining motor symptom management in Parkinson's disease (PD).

Palopoli-Trojani K, Schmidt S, Baringer K, Slotkin T, Peters J, Turner D Brain Stimul. 2023; 16(6):1630-1642.

PMID: 37863388 PMC: 10872419. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.009.


References
1.
Ekker M, Janssen S, Nonnekes J, Bloem B, de Vries N . Neurorehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: Future perspectives for behavioural adaptation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015; 22 Suppl 1:S73-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.08.031. View

2.
Leuthardt E, Schalk G, Moran D, Ojemann J . The emerging world of motor neuroprosthetics: a neurosurgical perspective. Neurosurgery. 2006; 59(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000221506.06947.AC. View

3.
Morrell M . Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2011; 77(13):1295-304. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182302056. View

4.
Gilbert D, Bansal A, Sethuraman G, Sallee F, Zhang J, Lipps T . Association of cortical disinhibition with tic, ADHD, and OCD severity in Tourette syndrome. Mov Disord. 2004; 19(4):416-25. DOI: 10.1002/mds.20044. View

5.
Swann N, de Hemptinne C, Miocinovic S, Qasim S, Wang S, Ziman N . Gamma Oscillations in the Hyperkinetic State Detected with Chronic Human Brain Recordings in Parkinson's Disease. J Neurosci. 2016; 36(24):6445-58. PMC: 5015781. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1128-16.2016. View