» Articles » PMID: 29066708

Survivorship Analysis of Clinical Adjacent-Segment Pathology After Single-Level Cervical Fusion

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2017 Oct 26
PMID 29066708
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BACKGROUND Clinical adjacent-segment pathology (CASP) is an important problem after anterior cervical surgery. The purpose of this study was to predict prevalence of CASP and determine the possible risk factors for CASP after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed a series of patients who underwent single-level cervical discectomy and fusion surgery (ACDF). Both basic and radiographic data of patients were collected. Life-table method and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to calculate prevalence of CASP and disease-free survival rate. Cox analysis was performed to determine the predictive factors for it. RESULTS A total of 256 patients were included in this study. The mean length of follow-up was 70.64 months. Among them, 31 patients were diagnosed as having CASP during follow-up. Nineteen of them were at the cephalad adjacent segment, and the other 12 were at the caudal segment. After ACDF procedures, 10.01% of patients developed new symptoms of CASP within 5 years, and the incidence increased to 23.89% after 10 years. The incidence rate of CASP was an average of 2.46% per year. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that congenital stenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 3.250; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.538-6.867) and degeneration of adjacent segment (HR, 2.681; 95% CI, 1.259-5.709) were correlated with the incidence of CASP. CONCLUSIONS Patients with congenital stenosis and pre-existing degenerative changes of adjacent segments had a higher risk of developing CASP after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Citing Articles

Two-year results of single-level fixation with lateral mass screws for cervical degenerative spondylolisthesis: patient series.

Kodama H, Kawamura N, Ohya J, Onishi Y, Horii C, Nishizawa M J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023; 6(15).

PMID: 37910011 PMC: 10566526. DOI: 10.3171/CASE23343.


Risk factors associated with clinical adjacent segment pathology following multi-level cervical fusion surgery.

Kong L, Sun C, Kou N, Bai J, Zhang J, Lu J Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(48):e13480.

PMID: 30508976 PMC: 6283054. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013480.

References
1.
Faldini C, Pagkrati S, Leonetti D, Miscione M, Giannini S . Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 469(3):674-81. PMC: 3032843. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1614-z. View

2.
Lee J, Lee S, Peters C, Riew K . Risk-factor analysis of adjacent-segment pathology requiring surgery following anterior, posterior, fusion, and nonfusion cervical spine operations: survivorship analysis of 1358 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(21):1761-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01482. View

3.
Zhang J, Cao J, Meng F, Shen Y . Cervical canal stenosis and adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical arthrodesis. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24(8):1590-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3975-1. View

4.
Eubanks J, Belding J, Schnaser E, Rowan A, Moffitt G, Weaver J . Congenital stenosis and adjacent segment disease in the cervical spine. Orthopedics. 2013; 36(10):e1251-5. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130920-15. View

5.
Lawrence B, Hilibrand A, Brodt E, Dettori J, Brodke D . Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology in the cervical spine: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37(22 Suppl):S52-64. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d60fb. View