» Articles » PMID: 12435970

Biomechanical Study on the Effect of Cervical Spine Fusion on Adjacent-level Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Motion

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2002 Nov 19
PMID 12435970
Citations 224
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: A biomechanical study was performed using cadaveric cervical spine specimens.

Objective: To determine the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure.

Summary Of Background Data: Clinical studies have reported that patients with spinal fusion are at greater risk of pathology and early disc degeneration at adjacent levels. It is hypothesized that eliminating motion at one level leads to hypermobility and increased forces at adjacent levels, thus increasing the rate of disc degeneration.

Methods: Six cadaveric cervical spine specimens were tested. Specimens were stabilized at T1 and loaded at C3 to 20 degrees of flexion and 15 degrees of extension. Intradiscal pressures and segmental motion at C4-C5 and C6-C7 were recorded first on intact specimens, and then after anterior cervical plating at C5-C6. Changes in intradiscal pressure and segmental motion were calculated and statistically analyzed using a paired Student t test.

Results: Intradiscal pressures were significantly increased during flexion at both adjacent levels. The pressure increased by 73.2% at C4-C5 (P = 0.002), and by 45.3% at C6-C7 (P = 0.006). Intradiscal pressures increased at both adjacent levels during extension, but not significantly. During flexion, segmental motion increased at both adjacent levels, with greater increases at C4-C5. During extension, segmental motion increased at both adjacent levels, with greater increases at C6-C7.

Conclusions: Clinical studies have reported increased rates of disc degeneration at levels adjacent to fusion. It is believed that eliminating motion through fusion shifts the load to the adjacent levels, causing earlier disc degeneration. This study has shown that significant increases in intradiscal pressure and segmental motion occur at levels adjacent to fusion during normal range of motion. These results may partially explain the mechanism of early disc degeneration at levels adjacent to cervical spine fusion.

Citing Articles

Complications and reoperations in young versus old patients undergoing cervical disc arthroplasty.

Nilssen P, Shafi K, Narendran N, Farivar D, Nomoto E, Mikhail C N Am Spine Soc J. 2025; 21:100589.

PMID: 40034338 PMC: 11875681. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100589.


The Association Between Clival Axial Angle and Distal Junctional Failure After Craniocervical Fusion.

Schneider D, Gandhi S, Ward M, White T, Brown E, Pennington Z Global Spine J. 2025; :21925682251323220.

PMID: 39973306 PMC: 11840828. DOI: 10.1177/21925682251323220.


Three dimensional-printed artificial disc replacement for single-level cervical spondylosis: a cohort study.

Zhang X, Gao Z, Yao X, Xu Z, Hao D Int Orthop. 2024; 49(1):195-202.

PMID: 39387882 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06328-9.


Human head-neck model and its application thresholds: a narrative review.

Liang Z, Wu K, Tian T, Mo F Int J Surg. 2024; 111(1):1042-1070.

PMID: 38990352 PMC: 11745654. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001941.


Can We Rely on Prophylactic Two-Level Vertebral Cement Augmentation in Long-Segment Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery to Reduce the Incidence of Proximal Junctional Complications?.

Tani Y, Naka N, Ono N, Kawashima K, Paku M, Ishihara M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929477 PMC: 11205771. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060860.