» Articles » PMID: 29056872

Parent Prevention Communication Profiles and Adolescent Substance Use: A Latent Profile Analysis and Growth Curve Model

Overview
Journal J Fam Commun
Date 2017 Oct 24
PMID 29056872
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This current study identifies distinct parent prevention communication profiles and examines whether youth with different parental communication profiles have varying substance use trajectories over time. Eleven schools in two rural school districts in the Midwestern United States were selected, and 784 students were surveyed at three time points from the beginning of 7th grade to the end of 8th grade. A series of latent profile analyses were performed to identify discrete profiles/subgroups of substance-specific prevention communication (SSPC). The results revealed a 4-profile model of SSPC: Active-Open, Passive-Open, Active-Silent, and Passive-Silent. A growth curve model revealed different rates of lifetime substance use depending on the youth's SSPC profile. These findings have implications for parenting interventions and tailoring messages for parents to fit specific SSPC profiles.

Citing Articles

Parent SMART: Effects of residential treatment and an adjunctive parenting intervention on behavioral health services utilization.

Becker S, Janssen T, Shiller H, DiBartolo E, Fan Y, Souza T J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024; 166:209399.

PMID: 38762125 PMC: 11875231. DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209399.


Examining profiles of convergence and divergence in reports of parental warmth: Links to adolescent developmental problems.

Sloan C, Forrester E, Lanza S, Feinberg M, Fosco G Dev Psychopathol. 2024; :1-17.

PMID: 38618936 PMC: 11473715. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579424000762.


The role of parenting in developmental trajectories of risk for adolescent substance use: a bioecological systems cascade model.

Marceau K Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1277419.

PMID: 38054168 PMC: 10694242. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1277419.


Evaluation of Positive Choices, a National Initiative to Disseminate Evidence-Based Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention Strategies: Web-Based Survey Study.

Stapinski L, Nepal S, Guckel T, Grummitt L, Chapman C, Lynch S JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022; 5(3):e34721.

PMID: 36018617 PMC: 9463616. DOI: 10.2196/34721.


A snapshot of parenting practices useful for preventing adolescent vaping.

Choi H, Miller-Day M, Hecht M, Glenn S, Lyons R, Greene K Addict Behav Rep. 2022; 15:100418.

PMID: 35252537 PMC: 8894141. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100418.


References
1.
Hansen W, Graham J . Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Prev Med. 1991; 20(3):414-30. DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(91)90039-7. View

2.
Spoth R, Trudeau L, Guyll M, Shin C, Redmond C . Universal intervention effects on substance use among young adults mediated by delayed adolescent substance initiation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009; 77(4):620-32. PMC: 2876977. DOI: 10.1037/a0016029. View

3.
Cavazos-Rehg P, Housten A, Krauss M, Sowles S, Spitznagel E, Chaloupka F . Selected State Policies and Associations With Alcohol Use Behaviors and Risky Driving Behaviors Among Youth: Findings from Monitoring the Future Study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016; 40(5):1030-6. PMC: 4844755. DOI: 10.1111/acer.13041. View

4.
Turrisi R, Wiersma K, Hughes K . Binge-drinking-related consequences in college students: role of drinking beliefs and mother-teen communications. Psychol Addict Behav. 2000; 14(4):342-55. DOI: 10.1037//0893-164x.14.4.342. View

5.
Newton-Howes G, Boden J . Relation between age of first drinking and mental health and alcohol and drug disorders in adulthood: evidence from a 35-year cohort study. Addiction. 2015; 111(4):637-44. DOI: 10.1111/add.13230. View