» Articles » PMID: 29041972

Understanding the Preference for Homebirth; an Exploration of Key Barriers to Facility Delivery in Rural Tanzania

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Oct 19
PMID 29041972
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is limited information on the effect of expectant parents' socio-cultural perceptions and practices on the use of skilled birth attendants (SBAs) in rural Tanzania. The purpose of this study was to explore the socio-cultural barriers to health facility birth and SBA among parents choosing home birth in rural Tanzania, specifically in the Rukwa Region.

Methods: This study used a descriptive exploratory methodology. Purposive sampling was used to recruit study participants for both in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focused group discussions (FGDs). Qualitative research methods, including FGDs and IDIs, were utilized in data collection. The respondents were men and women whose youngest child had been born at home within the prior 12 months. A thematic approach was used for data analysis.

Results: The main themes that emerged regarding barriers to the use of health facility were 1) limited decision-making by men on place of delivery; 2) low risk perception by men and its interference with health facility birth; 3) men's limited resource mobilization for health facility birth and 4) females' perceptions that pregnancy and childbirth are low-risk events.

Conclusion: This qualitative study demonstrates that apart from well-documented structural barriers to skilled birth attendance in rural Tanzania, the low risk perception among both men and women plays a substantial role. The low risk perception among both men and women affects the use of SBAs in two ways. First, women become negligent and take risk of delivering at home. Second, male partners do not seriously mobilize resources for health facility childbirth. These findings reinforce the urgent need to implement creative programs to increase genuine male participation in facilitation of health facility childbirth.

Citing Articles

Predicting facility-based delivery in Zanzibar: The vulnerability of machine learning algorithms to adversarial attacks.

Tsai Y, Fulcher I, Li T, Sukums F, Hedt-Gauthier B Heliyon. 2023; 9(5):e16244.

PMID: 37234636 PMC: 10205516. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16244.


Understanding birthing preferences of women in Benin City, Nigeria: a qualitative study.

Eluobaju D, Okonofua F, Weine S, Goba G BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e054603.

PMID: 37130674 PMC: 10163546. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054603.


Machine learning for maternal health: Predicting delivery location in a community health worker program in Zanzibar.

Fredriksson A, Fulcher I, Russell A, Li T, Tsai Y, Seif S Front Digit Health. 2022; 4:855236.

PMID: 36060544 PMC: 9428344. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.855236.


Identifying Programmatic Factors that Increase Likelihood of Health Facility Delivery: Results from a Community Health Worker Program in Zanzibar.

Hentschel E, Russell A, Said S, Tibaijuka J, Hedt-Gauthier B, Fulcher I Matern Child Health J. 2022; 26(9):1840-1853.

PMID: 35386028 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-022-03432-3.


Exploring women's decisions of where to give birth in the Peruvian Amazon; why do women continue to give birth at home? A qualitative study.

Gardiner E, Lai J, Khanna D, Meza G, de Wildt G, Taylor B PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0257135.

PMID: 34506573 PMC: 8432815. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257135.


References
1.
Mrisho M, Schellenberg J, Mushi A, Obrist B, Mshinda H, Tanner M . Factors affecting home delivery in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2007; 12(7):862-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01855.x. View

2.
Iliyasu Z, Abubakar I, Galadanci H, Aliyu M . Birth preparedness, complication readiness and fathers' participation in maternity care in a northern Nigerian community. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010; 14(1):21-32. View

3.
Bedford J, Gandhi M, Admassu M, Girma A . 'A normal delivery takes place at home': a qualitative study of the location of childbirth in rural Ethiopia. Matern Child Health J. 2012; 17(2):230-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-0965-3. View

4.
Bohren M, Hunter E, Munthe-Kaas H, Souza J, Vogel J, Gulmezoglu A . Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014; 11(1):71. PMC: 4247708. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-71. View

5.
White D, Dynes M, Rubardt M, Sissoko K, Stephenson R . The influence of intrafamilial power on maternal health care in Mali: perspectives of women, men and mothers-in-law. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013; 39(2):58-68. DOI: 10.1363/3905813. View