» Articles » PMID: 29038607

Advanced, Analytic, Automated (AAA) Measurement of Engagement During Learning

Overview
Journal Educ Psychol
Publisher Routledge
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2017 Oct 18
PMID 29038607
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is generally acknowledged that engagement plays a critical role in learning. Unfortunately, the study of engagement has been stymied by a lack of valid and efficient measures. We introduce the advanced, analytic, and automated (AAA) approach to measure engagement at fine-grained temporal resolutions. The AAA measurement approach is grounded in embodied theories of cognition and affect, which advocate a close coupling between thought and action. It uses machine-learned computational models to automatically infer mental states associated with engagement (e.g., interest, flow) from machine-readable behavioral and physiological signals (e.g., facial expressions, eye tracking, click-stream data) and from aspects of the environmental context. We present15 case studies that illustrate the potential of the AAA approach for measuring engagement in digital learning environments. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of the AAA approach, concluding that it has significant promise to catalyze engagement research.

Citing Articles

Advancing Emotionally Aware Child-Robot Interaction with Biophysical Data and Insight-Driven Affective Computing.

Faria D, Godkin A, da Silva Ayrosa P Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).

PMID: 40006397 PMC: 11858965. DOI: 10.3390/s25041161.


Boredom signals deviation from a cognitive homeostatic set point.

Trudel C, Risko E, Eastwood J, van Tilburg W, Elpidorou A, Danckert J Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):22.

PMID: 39929959 PMC: 11811027. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00209-6.


Fostering learning engagement: the impact of different interpersonal relationships from the perspective of positive youth development.

Zhu M, Yao X, Bin Abu Talib M Front Psychol. 2025; 15():1419588.

PMID: 39830838 PMC: 11738624. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1419588.


Supporting Adolescent Engagement with Artificial Intelligence-Driven Digital Health Behavior Change Interventions.

Giovanelli A, Rowe J, Taylor M, Berna M, Tebb K, Penilla C J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e40306.

PMID: 37223987 PMC: 10248780. DOI: 10.2196/40306.


What can multimodal data tell us about online synchronous training: Learning outcomes and engagement of in-service teachers.

Xiao J, Jiang Z, Wang L, Yu T Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1092848.

PMID: 36687926 PMC: 9853895. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1092848.


References
1.
Mehu M, Scherer K . A psycho-ethological approach to social signal processing. Cogn Process. 2012; 13 Suppl 2:397-414. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-012-0435-2. View

2.
Hoffman J, Subramaniam B . The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys. 1995; 57(6):787-95. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206794. View

3.
Podsakoff P, Mackenzie S, Lee J, Podsakoff N . Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(5):879-903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. View

4.
Poh M, McDuff D, Picard R . Advancements in noncontact, multiparameter physiological measurements using a webcam. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010; 58(1):7-11. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2086456. View

5.
Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R . Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987; 175(9):526-36. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004. View