» Articles » PMID: 29038381

Has Molecular Imaging Delivered to Drug Development?

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pharmaceutical research and development requires a systematic interrogation of a candidate molecule through clinical studies. To ensure resources are spent on only the most promising molecules, early clinical studies must understand fundamental attributes of the drug candidate, including exposure at the target site, target binding and pharmacological response in disease. Molecular imaging has the potential to quantitatively characterize these properties in small, efficient clinical studies. Specific benefits of molecular imaging in this setting (compared to blood and tissue sampling) include non-invasiveness and the ability to survey the whole body temporally. These methods have been adopted primarily for neuroscience drug development, catalysed by the inability to access the brain compartment by other means. If we believe molecular imaging is a technology platform able to underpin clinical drug development, why is it not adopted further to enable earlier decisions? This article considers current drug development needs, progress towards integration of molecular imaging into studies, current impediments and proposed models to broaden use and increase impact.This article is part of the themed issue 'Challenges for chemistry in molecular imaging'.

Citing Articles

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of radiolabeled intraocular anti-CLEC14a antibody in preclinical animal species and application in humans.

Park S, Lee Y, Oh J, Kim S, Lee S, Lee H Clin Transl Sci. 2022; 15(12):2938-2946.

PMID: 36129122 PMC: 9747121. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13412.


Metastatic and non-metastatic melanoma imaging using Sgc8-c aptamer PTK7-recognizer.

Sicco E, Monaco A, Fernandez M, Moreno M, Calzada V, Cerecetto H Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):19942.

PMID: 34620894 PMC: 8497559. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98828-6.


Challenges for chemistry in molecular imaging.

Parker D, Long N, Faulkner S Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017; 375(2107).

PMID: 29038379 PMC: 5647267. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0024.

References
1.
Jorgensen J, Persson M, Madsen J, Kjaer A . High tumor uptake of (64)Cu: implications for molecular imaging of tumor characteristics with copper-based PET tracers. Nucl Med Biol. 2013; 40(3):345-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.01.002. View

2.
Morgan P, van der Graaf P, Arrowsmith J, Feltner D, Drummond K, Wegner C . Can the flow of medicines be improved? Fundamental pharmacokinetic and pharmacological principles toward improving Phase II survival. Drug Discov Today. 2012; 17(9-10):419-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.12.020. View

3.
Zhang L, Villalobos A, Beck E, Bocan T, Chappie T, Chen L . Design and selection parameters to accelerate the discovery of novel central nervous system positron emission tomography (PET) ligands and their application in the development of a novel phosphodiesterase 2A PET ligand. J Med Chem. 2013; 56(11):4568-79. DOI: 10.1021/jm400312y. View

4.
Matthews P, Rabiner E, Passchier J, Gunn R . Positron emission tomography molecular imaging for drug development. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 73(2):175-86. PMC: 3269576. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04085.x. View

5.
Lammertsma A . Forward to the Past: The Case for Quantitative PET Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2017; 58(7):1019-1024. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.188029. View