» Articles » PMID: 29037600

Asymmetric Phosphatidylethanolamine Distribution Controls Fusion Pore Lifetime and Probability

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2017 Oct 18
PMID 29037600
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Little attention has been given to how the asymmetric lipid distribution of the plasma membrane might facilitate fusion pore formation during exocytosis. Phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), a cone-shaped phospholipid, is predominantly located in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane and has been proposed to promote membrane deformation and stabilize fusion pores during exocytotic events. To explore this possibility, we modeled exocytosis using plasma membrane SNARE-containing planar-supported bilayers and purified neuroendocrine dense core vesicles (DCVs) as fusion partners, and we examined how different PE distributions between the two leaflets of the supported bilayers affected SNARE-mediated fusion. Using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, the fusion of single DCVs with the planar-supported bilayer was monitored by observing DCV-associated neuropeptide Y tagged with a fluorescent protein. The time-dependent line shape of the fluorescent signal enables detection of DCV docking, fusion-pore opening, and vesicle collapse into the planar membrane. Four different distributions of PE in the planar bilayer mimicking the plasma membrane were examined: exclusively in the leaflet facing the DCVs; exclusively in the opposite leaflet; equally distributed in both leaflets; and absent from both leaflets. With PE in the leaflet facing the DCVs, overall fusion was most efficient and the extended fusion pore lifetime (0.7 s) enabled notable detection of content release preceding vesicle collapse. All other PE distributions decreased fusion efficiency, altered pore lifetime, and reduced content release. With PE exclusively in the opposite leaflet, resolution of pore opening and content release was lost.

Citing Articles

Functionally distinct SNARE motifs of SNAP25 cooperate in SNARE assembly and membrane fusion.

Kraichely K, Sandall C, Liang B, Kiessling V, Tamm L Biophys J. 2025; 124(4):637-650.

PMID: 39982442 PMC: 11900178. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.034.


Boosting Lipofection Efficiency Through Enhanced Membrane Fusion Mechanisms.

Pavlov R, Akimov S, Dashinimaev E, Bashkirov P Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 25(24.

PMID: 39769303 PMC: 11677079. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252413540.


Synaptobrevin2 monomers and dimers differentially engage to regulate the functional trans-SNARE assembly.

Patil S, Sanghrajka K, Sriram M, Chakraborty A, Majumdar S, Bhaskar B Life Sci Alliance. 2024; 7(4).

PMID: 38238088 PMC: 10796598. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202402568.


Review of Eukaryote Cellular Membrane Lipid Composition, with Special Attention to the Fatty Acids.

Ali O, Szabo A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(21).

PMID: 37958678 PMC: 10649022. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115693.


Mechanisms of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion.

Jahn R, Cafiso D, Tamm L Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023; 25(2):101-118.

PMID: 37848589 PMC: 11578640. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-023-00668-x.


References
1.
Martens S, McMahon H . Mechanisms of membrane fusion: disparate players and common principles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008; 9(7):543-56. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2417. View

2.
Calderon R, DeVries G . Lipid composition and phospholipid asymmetry of membranes from a Schwann cell line. J Neurosci Res. 1997; 49(3):372-80. View

3.
Stratton B, Warner J, Wu Z, Nikolaus J, Wei G, Wagnon E . Cholesterol Increases the Openness of SNARE-Mediated Flickering Fusion Pores. Biophys J. 2016; 110(7):1538-1550. PMC: 4833774. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.02.019. View

4.
Zareh S, DeSantis M, Kessler J, Li J, Wang Y . Single-image diffusion coefficient measurements of proteins in free solution. Biophys J. 2012; 102(7):1685-91. PMC: 3318113. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.02.030. View

5.
Hui S, Stewart T, Boni L, Yeagle P . Membrane fusion through point defects in bilayers. Science. 1981; 212(4497):921-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.7233185. View